Comment # 11 on bug 65873 from Tom Stellard

(In reply to comment #10)
> I've got a draft fix in my libclc repo on fdo.o.  I've tested for
> regressions on Cedar (successfully), and I will test on SI with your 64-bit
> load patch asap (hopefully tonight, but we'll see).

I took a look at your libclc fix, and I realized that we can't use address
space qualifiers in common code, because addrspace(1) may not mean global
address space on all targets.

I think you might find that the optimizers are good enough to turn a .cl
implementation into optimal code, but if not we may be have to move the LLVM IR
implementations into target specific code.