From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 65873] R600/SI: Cannot select store with truncate to 32-bit Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:27:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0238269256==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D65E5CF8 for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:27:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0238269256== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1372393675.8CD1fcC1.17178"; charset="us-ascii" --1372393675.8CD1fcC1.17178 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:27:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65873 --- Comment #11 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #10) > I've got a draft fix in my libclc repo on fdo.o. I've tested for > regressions on Cedar (successfully), and I will test on SI with your 64-bit > load patch asap (hopefully tonight, but we'll see). I took a look at your libclc fix, and I realized that we can't use address space qualifiers in common code, because addrspace(1) may not mean global address space on all targets. I think you might find that the optimizers are good enough to turn a .cl implementation into optimal code, but if not we may be have to move the LLVM IR implementations into target specific code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1372393675.8CD1fcC1.17178 Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 04:27:55 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 11 on bug 65873 from 
(In reply to comment #10)
> I've got a draft fix in my libclc repo on fdo.o.  I've tested for
> regressions on Cedar (successfully), and I will test on SI with your 64-bit
> load patch asap (hopefully tonight, but we'll see).

I took a look at your libclc fix, and I realized that we can't use address
space qualifiers in common code, because addrspace(1) may not mean global
address space on all targets.

I think you might find that the optimizers are good enough to turn a .cl
implementation into optimal code, but if not we may be have to move the LLVM IR
implementations into target specific code.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1372393675.8CD1fcC1.17178-- --===============0238269256== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel --===============0238269256==--