From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 69675] audio broken in 24Hz/24p since 3.11 (regression)
Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:44:46 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1771219642=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC812EE940
for ;
Sat, 2 Nov 2013 04:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Sender: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============1771219642==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1383392686.E7CFA3.21303"; charset="us-ascii"
--1383392686.E7CFA3.21303
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:44:46 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69675
--- Comment #42 from Pierre Ossman ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> I think with a) the "table" was used and with b) the values were calculated.
> So both seem fine. I am a bit afraid with the "out of spec" values - but it
> did not harm here and the kernel print did not happen.
Actually, I believe with a) the sw values (table, calculated or otherwise) are
ignored and the hw does its own thing. With b) you will most likely use the
table since all common modes will be in that table. So the calculation was most
likely never tested.
As for the out of spec one, that would be 640x480 at 60/1.001 Hz.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--1383392686.E7CFA3.21303
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:44:46 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Comment # 42
on bug 69675
from Pierre Ossman
(In reply to comment #41)
> I think with a) the "table" was used and with b) the values were calculated.
> So both seem fine. I am a bit afraid with the "out of spec" values - but it
> did not harm here and the kernel print did not happen.
Actually, I believe with a) the sw values (table, calculated or otherwise) are
ignored and the hw does its own thing. With b) you will most likely use the
table since all common modes will be in that table. So the calculation was most
likely never tested.
As for the out of spec one, that would be 640x480 at 60/1.001 Hz.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
--1383392686.E7CFA3.21303--
--===============1771219642==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--===============1771219642==--