Comment # 10 on bug 69675 from Pierre Ossman

(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (In reply to comment #4)
> > > Something like this:
> > 
> > Not really, the selection doesn't work like that - clock has to match
> > exactly to the table value, it is not an upper bound.
> 
> I just meant to patch the table so that you end up using the pre-defined
> values for CTS and N rather than calculating them from the formula.
> 
> {  xxx, 11648, 210937, 17836, 234375, 11648, 140625 }, /*  74.25/1.001 MHz */
> 
> Replace xxx with whatever clock value the drm edid code gives you for
> 74.25/1.001 MHz.
> 

So what should I actually try for the second patch? What you wrote? Or the
value from the mode line? :)