From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 76564] [AMD Fusion E-350] HDMI refresh rates doesn't match expectations Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 20:25:38 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1268617615==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3436E76F for ; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 13:25:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1268617615== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1396470338.be1dbE1.5932"; charset="us-ascii" --1396470338.be1dbE1.5932 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:25:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76564 --- Comment #52 from jeroen --- (In reply to comment #51) > This bugtracker is not about fglrx. Not a single thing will change for the > radeon oss driver cause of such statements. > > At the end - before we dropped support for it (xvba + fglrx) - it was not > even able to hold vsync without one core at 100%. So that's not any > alternative at all. > > Btw. such comments are really distracting, as we never had that good support > from AMD as we get from christian and alex right now. Then you misunderstand me! I think it is really good that radeon OSS is getting so much support. I never said I want fgrlx back. It is just that comments like "a wrong speed does NOT have direct influence on dropped or skipped frames." are not helping without any explanation and are not constructive. Most people on this mailing list have probably no idea how XBMC internally works making it difficult to help us. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1396470338.be1dbE1.5932 Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 20:25:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 52 on bug 76564 from 
(In reply to comment #51)
> This bugtracker is not about fglrx. Not a single thing will change for the
> radeon oss driver cause of such statements.
> 
> At the end - before we dropped support for it (xvba + fglrx) - it was not
> even able to hold vsync without one core at 100%. So that's not any
> alternative at all.
> 
> Btw. such comments are really distracting, as we never had that good support
> from AMD as we get from christian and alex right now. </offtopic>

Then you misunderstand me! I think it is really good that radeon OSS is getting
so much support. I never said I want fgrlx back.

It is just that comments like "a wrong speed does NOT have direct influence on
dropped or skipped frames." are not helping without any explanation and are not
constructive. Most people on this mailing list have probably no idea how XBMC
internally works making it difficult to help us. </offtopic>

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1396470338.be1dbE1.5932-- --===============1268617615== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel --===============1268617615==--