From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 82828] Regression: Crash in 3Dmark2001 Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:09:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0908721346==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4836E10F for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2014 11:09:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0908721346== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1409681365.f0EF2d3.28870"; charset="us-ascii" --1409681365.f0EF2d3.28870 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:09:25 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82828 --- Comment #13 from Tom Stellard --- (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 105630 [details] [review] > another debugging patch > > Ok, it looks like the problem is that node 0's q_total is bogus, which means > it never even gets considered for optimistic coloring. To help me figure out > why this is, can you apply this patch to master (not on top of the other > patch) and tell me the output of the piglit test now? On (In reply to comment #12) > Created attachment 105630 [details] [review] > another debugging patch > > Ok, it looks like the problem is that node 0's q_total is bogus, which means > it never even gets considered for optimistic coloring. To help me figure out > why this is, can you apply this patch to master (not on top of the other > patch) and tell me the output of the piglit test now? I'm not sure if this matters, but r300g pre-allocates the input registers before calling ra_allocate_no_spills(). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1409681365.f0EF2d3.28870 Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 18:09:25 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 13 on bug 82828 from 
(In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 105630 [details] [review] [review]
> another debugging patch
> 
> Ok, it looks like the problem is that node 0's q_total is bogus, which means
> it never even gets considered for optimistic coloring. To help me figure out
> why this is, can you apply this patch to master (not on top of the other
> patch) and tell me the output of the piglit test now?

On (In reply to comment #12)
> Created attachment 105630 [details] [review] [review]
> another debugging patch
> 
> Ok, it looks like the problem is that node 0's q_total is bogus, which means
> it never even gets considered for optimistic coloring. To help me figure out
> why this is, can you apply this patch to master (not on top of the other
> patch) and tell me the output of the piglit test now?

I'm not sure if this matters, but r300g pre-allocates the input registers
before calling ra_allocate_no_spills().

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1409681365.f0EF2d3.28870-- --===============0908721346== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel --===============0908721346==--