From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 89034] Firefox crashing xserver and some major rendering bugs Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:02:39 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0450966700==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3991E7201F for ; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:02:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0450966700== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1424854959.65a2Ec3.27643"; charset="UTF-8" --1424854959.65a2Ec3.27643 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:02:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D89034 --- Comment #34 from Michel D=C3=A4nzer --- (In reply to smoki from comment #33) > glsl-fs-min is one of the random failing tests actually, it sometimes pa= ss > sometimes fail with or without subreg liveness, so that is not problem he= re > i think. I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit regressio= ns with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness doesn't seem = to result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway. Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the R600_DEBUG=3Dvs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1424854959.65a2Ec3.27643 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:02:39 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Commen= t # 34 on bug 89034<= /a> from Michel D=C3=A4nzer 
(In reply to smoki from comment #33)
>  glsl-fs-min is one of the random failing tests =
actually, it sometimes pass
> sometimes fail with or without subreg liveness, so that is not problem=
 here
> i think.

I can't reproduce random failures with glsl-fs-min nor any piglit regressio=
ns
with sub-register liveness enabled, but sub-register liveness doesn't seem =
to
result in any code difference for glsl-fs-min anyway.


Can you find another test which consistently passes without sub-register
liveness and fails with it *and* shows a difference between them in the
R600_DEBUG=3Dvs,ps stderr output, and attach the latter for both cases?

You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1424854959.65a2Ec3.27643-- --===============0450966700== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============0450966700==--