From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 89198] Setting Refresh Rate on monitor causes flickering/artifacting Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 02:15:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1404807136==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5C06E5C8 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 18:15:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1404807136== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1424398526.cc60C450.15321"; charset="UTF-8" --1424398526.cc60C450.15321 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 02:15:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89198 --- Comment #19 from andre35822@yahoo.com --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #18) > (In reply to andre35822 from comment #17) > > Alright so I tried out the kernel I compiled with the patch from comment 15 > > on the other bug report, and either I didn't install the patch correctly (or > > it didnt install correctly) or the patch is not solving the problem. I am > > still getting the flickering/artifacts. I have attached an xorg log and > > dmesg log and added comment15_patch to each of their file names so they are > > easily distinguishable. Should I be compiling another kernel with the > > patches from comment 19 and 20? > > The patch from comment 15 doesn't fix anything. It just adds some > additional debugging output that might be useful in fine tuning the patches > in comments 19 and 20. To fix the issue, use the patches in comments 19 and > 20. Oh okay thats good then, that means I applied the patch correctly. Shall I apply the 19 and 20 patches now or would you prefer for a later date incase you fine-tune anything more? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1424398526.cc60C450.15321 Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 02:15:26 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"

Comment # 19 on bug 89198 from 
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #18)
> (In reply to andre35822 from comment #17)
> > Alright so I tried out the kernel I compiled with the patch from comment 15
> > on the other bug report, and either I didn't install the patch correctly (or
> > it didnt install correctly) or the patch is not solving the problem. I am
> > still getting the flickering/artifacts. I have attached an xorg log and
> > dmesg log and added comment15_patch to each of their file names so they are
> > easily distinguishable. Should I be compiling another kernel with the
> > patches from comment 19 and 20?
> 
> The patch from comment 15 doesn't fix anything.  It just adds some
> additional debugging output that might be useful in fine tuning the patches
> in comments 19 and 20.  To fix the issue, use the patches in comments 19 and
> 20.
Oh okay thats good then, that means I applied the patch correctly. Shall I
apply the 19 and 20 patches now or would you prefer for a later date incase you
fine-tune anything more?

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1424398526.cc60C450.15321-- --===============1404807136== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============1404807136==--