From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 90537] radeonsi bo/va conflict on RADEON_GEM_VA (rscreen->ws->buffer_from_handle returns NULL)
Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 10:00:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-90537-502-59Tep3zcHf@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-90537-502@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90537
--- Comment #24 from Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net> ---
(In reply to Christian König from comment #23)
> > How would it break backwards compatibility?
>
> You would need to allow multiple mappings into the same address space per BO.
>
> Which is exactly what I've did for amdgpu, but IIRC that would break the
> userspace interface because you won't return the mapped address any more
> when you try to map it multiple times....
What would that break? It could result in the same BO having several
representations in userspace, but (why) is that a problem?
> > I'm not sure how not tracking the VA ranges per GEM handle could ever work
> > as expected with several GEM handles referencing the same BO.
>
> Actually it can indeed never work correctly. What we just do all the time is
> trying to avoid the case that several GEM handles reference the same BO very
> hard.
I'm afraid we can't always avoid that though, e.g. when sharing BOs between
glamor and the Xorg driver.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2163 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-27 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 14:06 [Bug 90537] radeonsi bo/va conflict on RADEON_GEM_VA (rscreen->ws->buffer_from_handle returns NULL) bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-20 14:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-20 14:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-21 2:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-21 19:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-21 19:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-21 20:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-22 8:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-22 9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-22 11:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-22 12:07 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-22 12:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-23 1:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-24 14:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-24 14:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-24 14:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-25 12:10 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-25 16:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 9:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 9:30 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 16:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 18:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-26 18:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-05-27 10:00 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2015-06-25 2:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-90537-502-59Tep3zcHf@http.bugs.freedesktop.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).