Commen=
t # 23
on bug 91202<=
/a>
from Thomas R.
Guido, does that mean that now it works for you, or simply tha=
t you can't say
one way or the other because you didn't test with DAL actually running?
I'm asking because I finally got around to compile amd-staging-4.7 (which o=
nly
works with a certain set of kernel options, BTW), and with DAL enabled and =
both
the last commit and f67b5d74 you mentioned, I still see this bug. So now I'm
confused - am I doing something wrong, or was the fix a victim of the numer=
ous
DAL cleanups along the way, or maybe the freesync changes? I got "[drm=
] DAL is
enabled" in my kernel log at any rate, and freesync.c dumps stack trac=
es in
warn_slowpath_null, which I guess is just a development help and nothing
serious.
If I'd find a branch with both a working and non-working revision in it I'd=
be
willing to bisect, but going back in staging-4.7 removes DAL completely, and
staging-4.6 doesn't even compile for me, which was when I gave up yesterday.
It's a shame because apart from this, 4.7 works really, really well. So if
there is anything I can do to properly triangulate this problem, I'd be very
eager to help.