From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 91880] Radeonsi on Grenada cards (r9 390) exceptionally unstable and poorly performing Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:18:01 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0827978794==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C2F66EA54 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:18:01 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0827978794== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="15054022811.fa22.24046"; charset="UTF-8" --15054022811.fa22.24046 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:18:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D91880 --- Comment #176 from Jon Doane --- (In reply to Thomas DEBESSE from comment #175) > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #174) > > (In reply to Thomas DEBESSE from comment #173) > > >=20 > > > Their AMDGPU-PRO driver looks to not be affected by the bug, so they = have a > > > fix somewhere. Why this fix can't make it's way to the open driver? > >=20 > > The pro stack and the open stack share the same amdgpu kernel driver. >=20 > Yes I know, so what? >=20 > Is this a packaging issue like the firmware delivered not being the good = one > or things like that? I've experienced this issue with both AMDGPU-Pro and AMDGPU with the same visual artifacts out of the box. The radeon driver seems to not have the sa= me kind of visual artifacts that AMDGPU(-Pro) has but, it's just as unstable without intervention, at least for me. Changing the firmware didn't make en= ough of an impact to make my machine even close to stable by itself. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --15054022811.fa22.24046 Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 15:18:01 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comme= nt # 176 on bug 91880<= /a> from <= span class=3D"fn">Jon Doane 
(In reply to Thomas DEBESSE from comment #175)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #174)
> > (In reply to Thomas DEBESSE from comment #173)
> > >=20
> > > Their AMDGPU-PRO driver looks to not be affected by the bug,=
 so they have a
> > > fix somewhere. Why this fix can't make it's way to the open =
driver?
> >=20
> > The pro stack and the open stack share the same amdgpu kernel dri=
ver.
>=20
> Yes I know, so what?
>=20
> Is this a packaging issue like the firmware delivered not being the go=
od one
> or things like that?

I've experienced this issue with both AMDGPU-Pro and AMDGPU with the same
visual artifacts out of the box. The radeon driver seems to not have the sa=
me
kind of visual artifacts that AMDGPU(-Pro) has but, it's just as unstable
without intervention, at least for me. Changing the firmware didn't make en=
ough
of an impact to make my machine even close to stable by itself.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --15054022811.fa22.24046-- --===============0827978794== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============0827978794==--