From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 92709] "LLVM triggered Diagnostic Handler: unsupported call to function ldexpf in main" when starting race in stuntrally Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 17:33:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0712271991==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35B8892E2 for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:33:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0712271991== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1446485595.327fa2.4406"; charset="UTF-8" --1446485595.327fa2.4406 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:33:15 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D92709 --- Comment #5 from Matt Arsenault --- (In reply to Nicolai H=C3=A4hnle from comment #4) > Sure, I can look into that. >=20 > Matt, just to clarify: You mean adding a generic ISD::FLDEXP to > ISDOpcodes.h, together with assorted tests and changes in the generic > CodeGen infrastructure, right? Yes. This should be pretty trivial to do. Alternatively, it would probably be better to have an ldexp llvm intrinsic (which would also have the corresponding ISD::FLDEXP). It seems bizarre tha= t an llvm intrinsic would ever be changed to something involving a library call. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1446485595.327fa2.4406 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:33:15 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Comment= # 5 on bug 92709<= /a> from Matt Arsenault 
(In reply to Nicolai H=C3=A4hnle from comment #4)
> Sure, I can look into that.
>=20
> Matt, just to clarify: You mean adding a generic ISD::FLDEXP to
> ISDOpcodes.h, together with assorted tests and changes in the generic
> CodeGen infrastructure, right?

Yes. This should be pretty trivial to do.

Alternatively, it would probably be better to have an ldexp llvm intrinsic
(which would also have the corresponding ISD::FLDEXP). It seems bizarre tha=
t an
llvm intrinsic would ever be changed to something involving a library call.=

You are receiving this mail because: =20=20=20=20=20=20
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
--1446485595.327fa2.4406-- --===============0712271991== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0 cy5mcmVlZGVza3RvcC5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby9kcmktZGV2ZWwK --===============0712271991==--