From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 93826] 144Hz graphic glitches and bad refresh rate
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:59:06 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0325363061=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0F156E3CA
for ; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:59:06 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0325363061==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14567867460.21dc39dD8.21084";
charset="UTF-8"
--14567867460.21dc39dD8.21084
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:59:06 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93826
--- Comment #19 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Damien from comment #18)
> Alex thank you for your return.
>
> Since my monitor works from scratch with a 7950 or fury but not with three
> 290X tested, is that it is possible to retrieve the values that work ?
The same algorithm is used on all of those parts. The only reason there would
be different dividers selected would be if the pll limits in the vbios or the
reference clock were different. However, looking at various vbioses for those
different asics indicate that the vbios limits are the same for all of them. I
doubt they would be different on your boards. As such. that combination of
dividers seems to be disagreeable to your monitor on that specific hw. The
underlying hw implementation of the pll varies a bit from asic to asic, so the
pll selection probably needs to be tweaked a bit for that hw to be stable at
that combination as per comment 17.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--14567867460.21dc39dD8.21084
Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:59:06 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Comment # 19
on bug 93826
from Alex Deucher
(In reply to Damien from comment #18)
> Alex thank you for your return.
>
> Since my monitor works from scratch with a 7950 or fury but not with three
> 290X tested, is that it is possible to retrieve the values that work ?
The same algorithm is used on all of those parts. The only reason there would
be different dividers selected would be if the pll limits in the vbios or the
reference clock were different. However, looking at various vbioses for those
different asics indicate that the vbios limits are the same for all of them. I
doubt they would be different on your boards. As such. that combination of
dividers seems to be disagreeable to your monitor on that specific hw. The
underlying hw implementation of the pll varies a bit from asic to asic, so the
pll selection probably needs to be tweaked a bit for that hw to be stable at
that combination as per comment 17.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
--14567867460.21dc39dD8.21084--
--===============0325363061==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==
--===============0325363061==--