From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 94133] relatevly low performance rv740
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:19:57 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1901917339=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (unknown [131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DC26E038
for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 08:19:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============1901917339==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14553803970.C8BeC89e.4938";
charset="UTF-8"
--14553803970.C8BeC89e.4938
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:19:57 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94133
--- Comment #3 from Roman Elshin ---
yes, but my quastion: is it optimized for rv740 not less than for other chips
supported by r600g (for some reasons, bugs, etc..)? performance difference at
first sight seems too big.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--14553803970.C8BeC89e.4938
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 16:19:57 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
yes, but my quastion: is it optimized for rv740 not less than for other chips
supported by r600g (for some reasons, bugs, etc..)? performance difference at
first sight seems too big.