From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 94231] Problems compiling libdrm since glibc 2.23
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:59:54 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2003987514=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24036E233
for ; Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:59:54 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============2003987514==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14620463940.eE1AC.17590";
charset="UTF-8"
--14620463940.eE1AC.17590
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:59:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94231
--- Comment #21 from Emil Velikov ---
Should have mentioned it earlier - I thought the more portable thing was to use
AC_HEADER_MAJOR. Can we do that one as opposed to unconditionally including the
header ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--14620463940.eE1AC.17590
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2016 19:59:54 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html
Should have mentioned it earlier - I thought the more portable thing was to use
AC_HEADER_MAJOR. Can we do that one as opposed to unconditionally including the
header ?