From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 98505] [Topaz] Regression introduces in 4.8-rc3 Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0979494348==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9AD6E5D6 for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============0979494348== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14781057272.971C9.12406"; charset="UTF-8" --14781057272.971C9.12406 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98505 --- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher --- (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #11) > (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #10) > > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #7) > > > Created attachment 127678 [details] [review] [review] [review] > > > amdgpu patch that checks whether the new interface can be used for PM > > >=20 > > > PCIe port PM is not enabled because this BIOS is pre-2015: 12/04/2014 > > > The BIOS seems to be able to report support for lots of things (can y= ou post > > > a fuller dmesg that include the supported functions?): > >=20 > > Can we bump the bios white list to 2014? Windows enabled Hybrid graphi= cs on > > windows 8.x as well as 10, and a number of preliminary win10 systems ha= ve > > 2014 bios versions. I'd prefer that to doing all of these hacks in the = drivers. >=20 > Lowering the minumum from 2015 to 2014 should work for nouveau: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2016-July/025619.html >=20 For further clarify on your research, the current hybrid graphics spec requ= ires no connectors on the dGPU and hence no audio devices. For devices with connectors on the dGPU, they should use the older vendor specific methods a= nd PR# should not be exposed. > You can try to ask Mika, see v4.7-rc2-3-g9d26d3a. Maybe the presence of a > power resource (_PR3 or flags.power_resources) can be used as a hint whet= her > to enable port PM. Yes, the presence of _PR3 would be a great way to determine when to enable = it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14781057272.971C9.12406 Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 12 on bug 98505<= /a> from Alex Deucher
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #7)
> > > Created attachment 127678 [details] [review]=
 [review] [review] [review]
> > > amdgpu patch that checks whether the new interface can be us=
ed for PM
> > >=20
> > > PCIe port PM is not enabled because this BIOS is pre-2015: 1=
2/04/2014
> > > The BIOS seems to be able to report support for lots of thin=
gs (can you post
> > > a fuller dmesg that include the supported functions?):
> >=20
> > Can we bump the bios white list to 2014?  Windows enabled Hybrid =
graphics on
> > windows 8.x as well as 10, and a number of preliminary win10 syst=
ems have
> > 2014 bios versions. I'd prefer that to doing all of these hacks i=
n the drivers.
>=20
> Lowering the minumum from 2015 to 2014 should work for nouveau:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2016-July/025619.=
html
> 

For further clarify on your research, the current hybrid graphics spec requ=
ires
no connectors on the dGPU and hence no audio devices.  For devices with
connectors on the dGPU, they should use the older vendor specific methods a=
nd
PR# should not be exposed.

> You can try to ask Mika, see v4.7-rc2-3-g9d26d3a=
. Maybe the presence of a
> power resource (_PR3 or flags.power_resources) can be used as a hint w=
hether
> to enable port PM.

Yes, the presence of _PR3 would be a great way to determine when to enable =
it.


You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14781057272.971C9.12406-- --===============0979494348== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============0979494348==--