From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 98505] [Topaz] Regression introduces in 4.8-rc3
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0979494348=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[131.252.210.165])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9AD6E5D6
for ; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============0979494348==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14781057272.971C9.12406";
charset="UTF-8"
--14781057272.971C9.12406
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98505
--- Comment #12 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #7)
> > > Created attachment 127678 [details] [review] [review] [review]
> > > amdgpu patch that checks whether the new interface can be used for PM
> > >=20
> > > PCIe port PM is not enabled because this BIOS is pre-2015: 12/04/2014
> > > The BIOS seems to be able to report support for lots of things (can y=
ou post
> > > a fuller dmesg that include the supported functions?):
> >=20
> > Can we bump the bios white list to 2014? Windows enabled Hybrid graphi=
cs on
> > windows 8.x as well as 10, and a number of preliminary win10 systems ha=
ve
> > 2014 bios versions. I'd prefer that to doing all of these hacks in the =
drivers.
>=20
> Lowering the minumum from 2015 to 2014 should work for nouveau:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2016-July/025619.html
>=20
For further clarify on your research, the current hybrid graphics spec requ=
ires
no connectors on the dGPU and hence no audio devices. For devices with
connectors on the dGPU, they should use the older vendor specific methods a=
nd
PR# should not be exposed.
> You can try to ask Mika, see v4.7-rc2-3-g9d26d3a. Maybe the presence of a
> power resource (_PR3 or flags.power_resources) can be used as a hint whet=
her
> to enable port PM.
Yes, the presence of _PR3 would be a great way to determine when to enable =
it.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--14781057272.971C9.12406
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:55:27 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Commen=
t # 12
on bug 98505<=
/a>
from Alex Deucher
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #11)
> (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #7)
> > > Created attachment 127678 [details] [review]=
[review] [review] [review]
> > > amdgpu patch that checks whether the new interface can be us=
ed for PM
> > >=20
> > > PCIe port PM is not enabled because this BIOS is pre-2015: 1=
2/04/2014
> > > The BIOS seems to be able to report support for lots of thin=
gs (can you post
> > > a fuller dmesg that include the supported functions?):
> >=20
> > Can we bump the bios white list to 2014? Windows enabled Hybrid =
graphics on
> > windows 8.x as well as 10, and a number of preliminary win10 syst=
ems have
> > 2014 bios versions. I'd prefer that to doing all of these hacks i=
n the drivers.
>=20
> Lowering the minumum from 2015 to 2014 should work for nouveau:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/nouveau/2016-July/025619.=
html
>
For further clarify on your research, the current hybrid graphics spec requ=
ires
no connectors on the dGPU and hence no audio devices. For devices with
connectors on the dGPU, they should use the older vendor specific methods a=
nd
PR# should not be exposed.
> You can try to ask Mika, see v4.7-rc2-3-g9d26d3a=
. Maybe the presence of a
> power resource (_PR3 or flags.power_resources) can be used as a hint w=
hether
> to enable port PM.
Yes, the presence of _PR3 would be a great way to determine when to enable =
it.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
=
--14781057272.971C9.12406--
--===============0979494348==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==
--===============0979494348==--