From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org
Subject: [Bug 98505] [Topaz] Regression introduces in 4.8-rc3
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:42:22 +0000
Message-ID:
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1237765741=="
Return-path:
Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org
[IPv6:2610:10:20:722:a800:ff:fe98:4b55])
by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E7F6E408
for ; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:42:22 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org
Sender: "dri-devel"
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
--===============1237765741==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14785441422.AEF172da1.7656";
charset="UTF-8"
--14785441422.AEF172da1.7656
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:42:22 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98505
--- Comment #17 from Alex Deucher ---
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #16)
> Ok, do you have any certainty about the earliest BIOS date where _PR3 is
> used? E.g. if the minimum date is lowered to 2014 without checking for _P=
R3,
> would it be likely to miss out some models?
It's always used if it's available. I think 2014 should be ok (should catch
most of the early ones), but I'll check with our windows architects. I sus=
pect
it will come down to OEM/ODMs.
--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=
--14785441422.AEF172da1.7656
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:42:22 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Commen=
t # 17
on bug 98505<=
/a>
from Alex Deucher
(In reply to Peter Wu from comment #16)
> Ok, do you have any certainty about the earliest=
BIOS date where _PR3 is
> used? E.g. if the minimum date is lowered to 2014 without checking for=
_PR3,
> would it be likely to miss out some models?
It's always used if it's available. I think 2014 should be ok (should catch
most of the early ones), but I'll check with our windows architects. I sus=
pect
it will come down to OEM/ODMs.
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
=
--14785441422.AEF172da1.7656--
--===============1237765741==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline
X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz
dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg==
--===============1237765741==--