From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 98505] [radeon, amdgpu] Regression introduced in 4.8-rc3 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:17:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1550926402==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6281C6E235 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:17:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1550926402== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14788882680.cE671CD.10845"; charset="UTF-8" --14788882680.cE671CD.10845 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:17:48 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D98505 --- Comment #20 from Peter Wu --- (In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #19) > (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #16) > > Ok, do you have any certainty about the earliest BIOS date where _PR3 is > > used? E.g. if the minimum date is lowered to 2014 without checking for = _PR3, > > would it be likely to miss out some models? >=20 > Can you add me to any relevant threads? I'd like to help get this fixed = for > 4.9. I will, but did you get any feedback from the Windows architects yet? I'd l= ike to get some solid reasons that support lowering the version requirement. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14788882680.cE671CD.10845 Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:17:48 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Commen= t # 20 on bug 98505<= /a> from Peter Wu 
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #19)
> (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #16)
> > Ok, do you have any certainty about the earliest BIOS date where =
_PR3 is
> > used? E.g. if the minimum date is lowered to 2014 without checkin=
g for _PR3,
> > would it be likely to miss out some models?
>=20
> Can you add me to any relevant threads?  I'd like to help get this fix=
ed for
> 4.9.

I will, but did you get any feedback from the Windows architects yet? I'd l=
ike
to get some solid reasons that support lowering the version requirement.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14788882680.cE671CD.10845-- --===============1550926402== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============1550926402==--