Commen=
t # 14
on bug 99418<=
/a>
from lei.pero@gmail=
.com
(In reply to Michel D=C3=A4nzer from comment #13)
> (In reply to lei.pero from comment #7)
> > Sure, i will, it's like performace loss, I'm not sure if video wo=
uld do the
> > justice,
>=20
> Indeed, I'm afraid I can't see much difference, though the DRI2 videos=
do
> seem slightly smoother.
>=20
> Can you create another comparison video with the environment variable
> GALLIUM_HUD=3D.dfps,requested-VRAM+VRAM-usage,requested-GTT+GTT-usage,
> cpu+temperature+GPU-load,.dnum-bytes-moved,.dbuffer-wait-time,.dnum-
> compilations+num-shaders-created set when starting chromium? It should
> overlay some graphs showing the framerate and other performance related
> values.
>=20
>=20
> > I think this is hardware specific onr adeon driver (only?).
>=20
> Does it not happen using the modesetting driver instead of radeon?
Sure, I did it, will upload now. It does happen on modesetting driver
regardless of DRI version, strange. It's most visible on Chrome/ium scrolli=
ng,
but I can also notice it in standard GNOME-shell animations (for example, a=
fter
logging in startup animation is not smooth as it should be/as it is on rade=
on
DRI2), hope this information helps a bit. I'm very positive i can notice sa=
me
behaviour in games also (I'm not a gamer, so just a few I play).