From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@freedesktop.org Subject: [Bug 99967] RX 480 sclk clock speed lowers when under load Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:36:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1570675071==" Return-path: Received: from culpepper.freedesktop.org (culpepper.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.165]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3595088FAD for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:36:02 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1570675071== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14892681620.90CF4f.5572"; charset="UTF-8" --14892681620.90CF4f.5572 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:36:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D99967 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Haag --- Some more experimentation: The SaschaWillems Vulkan examples that cause a lot of gpu load (like computecullandlod) make the GPU run at the highest performance level. McNoppers OpenGL Example30 (raytracing with compute shaders) does the same. But Furmark still only makes the GPU run at 600-900 MHz. So most likely the cause is NOT in X or the general handling of one of the graphics APIs and most likely it is not a general power supply issue. It could be that it only happens when certain hardware parts of the GPU are under high load, or are not under high load. On IRC some people tried furmark and could not reproduce this behavior. (The user Remco with a factory overclocked XFX RX 480 too, though a different mo= del than mine). This is good news for the driver developers. This is not so good news for me because now I have to find out whether it's bad hardware (mainboard, GPU?) = on my part or something in my software configuration. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= --14892681620.90CF4f.5572 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:36:02 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated

Comment= # 3 on bug 99967<= /a> from Christoph Haag 
Some more experimentation:

The SaschaWillems Vulkan examples that cause a lot of gpu load (like
computecullandlod) make the GPU run at the highest performance level.

McNoppers OpenGL Example30 (raytracing with compute shaders) does the same.

But Furmark still only makes the GPU run at 600-900 MHz.

So most likely the cause is NOT in X or the general handling of one of the
graphics APIs and most likely it is not a general power supply issue.

It could be that it only happens when certain hardware parts of the GPU are
under high load, or are not under high load.

On IRC some people tried furmark and could not reproduce this behavior. (The
user Remco with a factory overclocked XFX RX 480 too, though a different mo=
del
than mine).

This is good news for the driver developers. This is not so good news for me
because now I have to find out whether it's bad hardware (mainboard, GPU?) =
on
my part or something in my software configuration.

You are receiving this mail because:
  • You are the assignee for the bug.
= --14892681620.90CF4f.5572-- --===============1570675071== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============1570675071==--