dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] v4l: vsp1: Add per-display list completion notification support
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 17:16:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cebc5274-09f7-b352-122d-debee39218fd@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180226214516.11559-12-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Hi Laurent,

On 26/02/18 21:45, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Display list completion is already reported to the frame end handler,
> but that mechanism is global to all display lists. In order to implement
> BRU and BRS reassignment in DRM pipelines we will need to wait for
> completion of a particular display list. Extend the display list and
> frame end handler APIs to support such a notification.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c    | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.h    |  4 ++--
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c   |  4 ++--
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.c  |  5 +++--
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.h  |  3 ++-
>  drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_video.c |  4 ++--
>  6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> index 0b86ed01e85d..eb2971218e28 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ struct vsp1_dl_body {
>   * @fragments: list of extra display list bodies
>   * @has_chain: if true, indicates that there's a partition chain
>   * @chain: entry in the display list partition chain
> + * @notify: whether the display list completion should be notified
>   */
>  struct vsp1_dl_list {
>  	struct list_head list;
> @@ -85,6 +86,8 @@ struct vsp1_dl_list {
>  
>  	bool has_chain;
>  	struct list_head chain;
> +
> +	bool notify;
>  };
>  
>  enum vsp1_dl_mode {
> @@ -550,8 +553,16 @@ static void vsp1_dl_list_commit_continuous(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl)
>  	 * case we can't replace the queued list by the new one, as we could
>  	 * race with the hardware. We thus mark the update as pending, it will
>  	 * be queued up to the hardware by the frame end interrupt handler.
> +	 *
> +	 * If a display list is already pending we simply drop it as the new
> +	 * display list is assumed to contain a more recent configuration. It is
> +	 * an error if the already pending list has the notify flag set, as
> +	 * there is then a process waiting for that list to complete. This
> +	 * shouldn't happen as the waiting process should perform proper
> +	 * locking, but warn just in case.
>  	 */
>  	if (vsp1_dl_list_hw_update_pending(dlm)) {
> +		WARN_ON(dlm->pending && dlm->pending->notify);
>  		__vsp1_dl_list_put(dlm->pending);
>  		dlm->pending = dl;
>  		return;
> @@ -581,7 +592,7 @@ static void vsp1_dl_list_commit_singleshot(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl)
>  	dlm->active = dl;
>  }
>  
> -void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl)
> +void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, bool notify)

Rather than changing the vsp1_dl_list_commit() function - would it be nicer to
have an API to request or set the notify property? :

@@..@@ static void vsp1_du_pipeline_configure(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
...
+	/* The BRx will be released, without sending an update to DRM */
+	if (drm_pipe->force_bru_release)
+		vsp1_dl_list_request_internal_notify(dl);

	vsp1_dl_list_commit(dl);
...


>  {
>  	struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm = dl->dlm;
>  	struct vsp1_dl_list *dl_child;
> @@ -598,6 +609,8 @@ void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	dl->notify = notify;
> +
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dlm->lock, flags);
>  
>  	if (dlm->singleshot)
> @@ -615,16 +628,23 @@ void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl)
>  /**
>   * vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end - Display list handler for the frame end interrupt
>   * @dlm: the display list manager
> + * @notify: whether the display list that completed has notification enabled
>   *
>   * Return true if the previous display list has completed at frame end, or false
>   * if it has been delayed by one frame because the display list commit raced
>   * with the frame end interrupt. The function always returns true in header mode
>   * as display list processing is then not continuous and races never occur.
> + *
> + * Upon return, the @notify parameter is set to true if the previous display
> + * list has completed and had been queued with the notify flag, or to false
> + * otherwise. Notification is only supported for continuous mode.
>   */
> -bool vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm)
> +bool vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm, bool *notify)
>  {
>  	bool completed = false;
>  
> +	*notify = false;
> +
>  	spin_lock(&dlm->lock);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -652,6 +672,9 @@ bool vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm)
>  	 * frame end interrupt. The display list thus becomes active.
>  	 */
>  	if (dlm->queued) {
> +		*notify = dlm->queued->notify;
> +		dlm->queued->notify = false;
> +
>  		__vsp1_dl_list_put(dlm->active);
>  		dlm->active = dlm->queued;
>  		dlm->queued = NULL;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.h b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.h
> index ee3508172f0a..480c6b0dd2e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_dl.h
> @@ -27,12 +27,12 @@ struct vsp1_dl_manager *vsp1_dlm_create(struct vsp1_device *vsp1,
>  					unsigned int prealloc);
>  void vsp1_dlm_destroy(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm);
>  void vsp1_dlm_reset(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm);
> -bool vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm);
> +bool vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm, bool *notify);
>  
>  struct vsp1_dl_list *vsp1_dl_list_get(struct vsp1_dl_manager *dlm);
>  void vsp1_dl_list_put(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl);
>  void vsp1_dl_list_write(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, u32 reg, u32 data);
> -void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl);
> +void vsp1_dl_list_commit(struct vsp1_dl_list *dl, bool notify);
>  
>  struct vsp1_dl_body *vsp1_dl_fragment_alloc(struct vsp1_device *vsp1,
>  					    unsigned int num_entries);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> index 1c8adda47440..d705a6e9fa1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_drm.c
> @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  static void vsp1_du_pipeline_frame_end(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe,
> -				       bool completed)
> +				       bool completed, bool notify)
>  {
>  	struct vsp1_drm_pipeline *drm_pipe = to_vsp1_drm_pipeline(pipe);
>  
> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static void vsp1_du_pipeline_configure(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	vsp1_dl_list_commit(dl);
> +	vsp1_dl_list_commit(dl, false);
>  }
>  
>  /* -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.c
> index 99ccbac3256a..4d819c9019f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.c
> @@ -316,6 +316,7 @@ bool vsp1_pipeline_ready(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  void vsp1_pipeline_frame_end(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  {
>  	bool completed;
> +	bool notify;
>  
>  	if (pipe == NULL)
>  		return;
> @@ -325,7 +326,7 @@ void vsp1_pipeline_frame_end(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  	 * up being postponed by one frame. @completed represents whether the
>  	 * active frame was finished or postponed.
>  	 */
> -	completed = vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(pipe->output->dlm);
> +	completed = vsp1_dlm_irq_frame_end(pipe->output->dlm, &notify);
>  

Eugh ... two return values, one passed back through the return, and the other
passed as a pointer.

What about converting this to some flags which get passed into the
pipe->frame_end() instead?

>  	if (pipe->hgo)
>  		vsp1_hgo_frame_end(pipe->hgo);
> @@ -338,7 +339,7 @@ void vsp1_pipeline_frame_end(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  	 * frame_end to account for vblank events.
>  	 */
>  	if (pipe->frame_end)
> -		pipe->frame_end(pipe, completed);
> +		pipe->frame_end(pipe, completed, notify);
>  
>  	pipe->sequence++;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.h b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.h
> index dfff9b5685fe..482711024fa2 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_pipe.h
> @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ struct vsp1_pipeline {
>  	enum vsp1_pipeline_state state;
>  	wait_queue_head_t wq;
>  
> -	void (*frame_end)(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe, bool completed);
> +	void (*frame_end)(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe, bool completed,
> +			  bool notify);
>  
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	struct kref kref;
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_video.c b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_video.c
> index cdd53d6cc408..483b4259e1b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_video.c
> @@ -437,14 +437,14 @@ static void vsp1_video_pipeline_run(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe)
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Complete, and commit the head display list. */
> -	vsp1_dl_list_commit(pipe->dl);
> +	vsp1_dl_list_commit(pipe->dl, false);
>  	pipe->dl = NULL;
>  
>  	vsp1_pipeline_run(pipe);
>  }
>  
>  static void vsp1_video_pipeline_frame_end(struct vsp1_pipeline *pipe,
> -					  bool completed)
> +					  bool completed, bool notify)
>  {
>  	struct vsp1_device *vsp1 = pipe->output->entity.vsp1;
>  	enum vsp1_pipeline_state state;
> 

--
Kieran
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-04 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-26 21:45 [PATCH 00/15] R-Car VSP1: Dynamically assign blend units to display pipelines Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 01/15] v4l: vsp1: Don't start/stop media pipeline for DRM Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 15:35   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 02/15] v4l: vsp1: Remove outdated comment Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-27  8:22   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2018-02-27  9:14     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 12:27   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-28 19:04     ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29  6:51       ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 03/15] v4l: vsp1: Remove unused field from vsp1_drm_pipeline structure Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 12:31   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 04/15] v4l: vsp1: Store pipeline pointer in vsp1_entity Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 13:46   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 05/15] v4l: vsp1: Use vsp1_entity.pipe to check if entity belongs to a pipeline Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:10   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29  7:00     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 06/15] v4l: vsp1: Share duplicated DRM pipeline configuration code Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:25   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 07/15] v4l: vsp1: Move DRM atomic commit pipeline setup to separate function Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 14:43   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-03-29  7:08     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 08/15] v4l: vsp1: Setup BRU at atomic commit time Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 19:01   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 09/15] v4l: vsp1: Replace manual DRM pipeline input setup in vsp1_du_setup_lif Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-28 15:01   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 10/15] v4l: vsp1: Move DRM pipeline output setup code to a function Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-29 11:49   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-02 12:35     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:15       ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-04 21:05         ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 11/15] v4l: vsp1: Add per-display list completion notification support Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:16   ` Kieran Bingham [this message]
2018-04-04 21:43     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-05  8:46       ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 12/15] v4l: vsp1: Generalize detection of entity removal from DRM pipeline Laurent Pinchart
2018-03-29 11:37   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-02 12:57     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 13/15] v4l: vsp1: Assign BRU and BRS to pipelines dynamically Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:00   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-04-04 21:57     ` Laurent Pinchart
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 14/15] v4l: vsp1: Add BRx dynamic assignment debugging messages Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:17   ` Kieran Bingham
2018-02-26 21:45 ` [PATCH 15/15] v4l: vsp1: Rename BRU to BRx Laurent Pinchart
2018-04-04 16:23   ` Kieran Bingham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cebc5274-09f7-b352-122d-debee39218fd@ideasonboard.com \
    --to=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox