From: John Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
To: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 16:54:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d97e4f76-34f8-7c14-3e6b-41800bda06f6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211222223532.28698-1-matthew.brost@intel.com>
On 12/22/2021 14:35, Matthew Brost wrote:
> A weak implementation of parallel submission (multi-bb execbuf IOCTL) for
> execlists. Doing as little as possible to support this interface for
> execlists - basically just passing submit fences between each request
> generated and virtual engines are not allowed. This is on par with what
> is there for the existing (hopefully soon deprecated) bonding interface.
>
> We perma-pin these execlists contexts to align with GuC implementation.
>
> v2:
> (John Harrison)
> - Drop siblings array as num_siblings must be 1
> v3:
> (John Harrison)
> - Drop single submission
> v4:
> (John Harrison)
> - Actually drop single submission
> - Use IS_ERR check on return value from intel_context_create
> - Set last request to NULL on unpin
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 11 ++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c | 4 +-
> .../drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c | 4 ++
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 2 -
> 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> index cad3f0b2be9e..b0d2d81fc3b3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -570,10 +570,6 @@ set_proto_ctx_engines_parallel_submit(struct i915_user_extension __user *base,
> struct intel_engine_cs **siblings = NULL;
> intel_engine_mask_t prev_mask;
>
> - /* FIXME: This is NIY for execlists */
> - if (!(intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&to_gt(i915)->uc)))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> if (get_user(slot, &ext->engine_index))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> @@ -583,6 +579,13 @@ set_proto_ctx_engines_parallel_submit(struct i915_user_extension __user *base,
> if (get_user(num_siblings, &ext->num_siblings))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_submission(&to_gt(i915)->uc) &&
> + num_siblings != 1) {
> + drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Only 1 sibling (%d) supported in non-GuC mode\n",
> + num_siblings);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> if (slot >= set->num_engines) {
> drm_dbg(&i915->drm, "Invalid placement value, %d >= %d\n",
> slot, set->num_engines);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> index ba083d800a08..5d0ec7c49b6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_context.c
> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ static int intel_context_active_acquire(struct intel_context *ce)
>
> __i915_active_acquire(&ce->active);
>
> - if (intel_context_is_barrier(ce) || intel_engine_uses_guc(ce->engine))
> + if (intel_context_is_barrier(ce) || intel_engine_uses_guc(ce->engine) ||
> + intel_context_is_parallel(ce))
> return 0;
>
> /* Preallocate tracking nodes */
> @@ -563,7 +564,6 @@ void intel_context_bind_parent_child(struct intel_context *parent,
> * Callers responsibility to validate that this function is used
> * correctly but we use GEM_BUG_ON here ensure that they do.
> */
> - GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_uses_guc(parent->engine));
> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_pinned(parent));
> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_child(parent));
> GEM_BUG_ON(intel_context_is_pinned(child));
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> index a69df5e9e77a..be56d0b41892 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_execlists_submission.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,43 @@ static void execlists_context_cancel_request(struct intel_context *ce,
> current->comm);
> }
>
> +static struct intel_context *
> +execlists_create_parallel(struct intel_engine_cs **engines,
> + unsigned int num_siblings,
> + unsigned int width)
> +{
> + struct intel_context *parent = NULL, *ce, *err;
> + int i;
> +
> + GEM_BUG_ON(num_siblings != 1);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < width; ++i) {
> + ce = intel_context_create(engines[i]);
> + if (IS_ERR(ce)) {
> + err = ce;
Could get rid of 'err' and just say 'return ce;' at the end of 'unwind:'.
Either way:
Reviewed-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
> + goto unwind;
> + }
> +
> + if (i == 0)
> + parent = ce;
> + else
> + intel_context_bind_parent_child(parent, ce);
> + }
> +
> + parent->parallel.fence_context = dma_fence_context_alloc(1);
> +
> + intel_context_set_nopreempt(parent);
> + for_each_child(parent, ce)
> + intel_context_set_nopreempt(ce);
> +
> + return parent;
> +
> +unwind:
> + if (parent)
> + intel_context_put(parent);
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> static const struct intel_context_ops execlists_context_ops = {
> .flags = COPS_HAS_INFLIGHT,
>
> @@ -2617,6 +2654,7 @@ static const struct intel_context_ops execlists_context_ops = {
> .reset = lrc_reset,
> .destroy = lrc_destroy,
>
> + .create_parallel = execlists_create_parallel,
> .create_virtual = execlists_create_virtual,
> };
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> index b3489599e4de..84456ffeb4cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_lrc.c
> @@ -1065,6 +1065,10 @@ lrc_pin(struct intel_context *ce,
>
> void lrc_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> {
> + if (unlikely(ce->parallel.last_rq)) {
> + i915_request_put(ce->parallel.last_rq);
> + ce->parallel.last_rq = NULL;
> + }
> check_redzone((void *)ce->lrc_reg_state - LRC_STATE_OFFSET,
> ce->engine);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> index e7517206af82..0a03a30e4c6d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c
> @@ -3248,8 +3248,6 @@ static void guc_parent_context_unpin(struct intel_context *ce)
> GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_context_is_parent(ce));
> GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_engine_is_virtual(ce->engine));
>
> - if (ce->parallel.last_rq)
> - i915_request_put(ce->parallel.last_rq);
> unpin_guc_id(guc, ce);
> lrc_unpin(ce);
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-23 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-22 22:35 [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Weak parallel submission support for execlists Matthew Brost
2021-12-23 0:54 ` John Harrison [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-11 21:20 Matthew Brost
2021-12-06 20:01 ` John Harrison
2021-12-22 22:21 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-20 21:47 Matthew Brost
2021-10-26 21:58 ` John Harrison
2021-10-27 19:17 ` Matthew Brost
2021-10-27 20:04 ` John Harrison
2021-10-27 20:10 ` Matthew Brost
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d97e4f76-34f8-7c14-3e6b-41800bda06f6@intel.com \
--to=john.c.harrison@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox