From: Aravind Iddamsetty <aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com>,
Lijo Lazar <lijo.lazar@amd.com>,
Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>,
Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>,
Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v5 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 21:00:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dd8e3840-1511-4606-8268-9edb1f7bc7a1@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aIqH6ip02p3WQ7Jv@wunner.de>
On 31-07-2025 02:30, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2025 at 12:19:51PM +0530, Aravind Iddamsetty wrote:
>> Our hardware supports RAS(Reliability, Availability, Serviceability) by
>> reporting the errors to the host, which the KMD processes and exposes a
>> set of error counters which can be used by observability tools to take
>> corrective actions or repairs. Traditionally there were being exposed
>> via PMU (for relative counters) and sysfs interface (for absolute
>> value) in our internal branch. But, due to the limitations in this
>> approach to use two interfaces and also not able to have an event based
>> reporting or configurability, an alternative approach to try netlink
>> was suggested by community for drm subsystem wide UAPI for RAS and
>> telemetry as discussed in [2].
>>
>> This [2] is the inspiration to this series. It uses the generic
>> netlink(genl) family subsystem and exposes a set of commands that can
>> be used by every drm driver, the framework provides a means to have
>> custom commands too.
> It seems this series was originally conceived in 2023. In the meantime,
> tooling has been introduced to auto-generate all the netlink boilerplate
> code from a YAML description in Documentation/netlink/specs/. I *think*
> using it is mandatory for all newly introduced Netlink protocols.
Thanks Lukas letting me know this. Will do the necessary.
Regards,
Aravind.
>
> Basically you create the uapi and kernel header files plus kernel source
> like this:
>
> tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/drm.yaml \
> --mode uapi --header
> tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/drm.yaml \
> --mode kernel --header
> tools/net/ynl/pyynl/ynl_gen_c.py --spec Documentation/netlink/specs/drm.yaml \
> --mode kernel --source
>
> And then you add both the YAML file as well as the generated files to
> the commit. The reason you have to do that is because Python is
> optional for building the kernel per Documentation/process/changes.rst,
> so the files cannot be generated at compile time. It is possible though
> to regenerate them with tools/net/ynl/ynl-regen.sh whenever the YAML file
> is changed.
>
> ynl_gen_c.py is capable of auto-generating code for user space applications
> as well. And there's tools/net/ynl/pyynl/cli.py to listen to events or
> send requests without having to write any code.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-31 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-30 6:49 [RFC v5 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-07-30 6:49 ` [RFC v5 1/5] drm/netlink: Add netlink infrastructure Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-15 17:07 ` Zack McKevitt
2025-08-21 9:45 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-25 17:31 ` Zack McKevitt
2025-08-15 21:48 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-26 5:58 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-07-30 6:49 ` [RFC v5 2/5] drm/xe/RAS: Register netlink capability Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-15 21:52 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-26 9:01 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-07-30 6:49 ` [RFC v5 3/5] drm/xe/RAS: Expose the error counters Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-15 21:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-26 9:26 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-07-30 6:49 ` [RFC v5 4/5] drm/netlink: Define multicast groups Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-15 22:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-07-30 6:49 ` [RFC v5 5/5] drm/xe/RAS: send multicast event on occurrence of an error Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-15 22:01 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-26 9:34 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-07-30 21:00 ` [RFC v5 0/5] Proposal to use netlink for RAS and Telemetry across drm subsystem Lukas Wunner
2025-07-31 15:30 ` Aravind Iddamsetty [this message]
2025-08-13 20:21 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-15 21:24 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-08-26 4:42 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-08-25 9:38 ` Aravind Iddamsetty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dd8e3840-1511-4606-8268-9edb1f7bc7a1@linux.intel.com \
--to=aravind.iddamsetty@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Hawking.Zhang@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lijo.lazar@amd.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).