From: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
To: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
matthew.auld@intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com
Cc: alexander.deucher@amd.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Dirty cleared blocks on free
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 15:41:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dda50b9d-1348-4fce-a513-c20e6223d58f@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eebf740c-2a96-434a-a114-2d168f51f774@amd.com>
On 02.07.25 13:58, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 7/2/2025 1:27 PM, Christian König wrote:
>> On 01.07.25 21:08, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
>>> Set the dirty bit when the memory resource is not cleared
>>> during BO release.
>>>
>>> v2(Christian):
>>> - Drop the cleared flag set to false.
>>> - Improve the amdgpu_vram_mgr_set_clear_state() function.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
>>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>>> Fixes: a68c7eaa7a8f ("drm/amdgpu: Enable clear page functionality")
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 1 -
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.h | 5 ++++-
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> index 9c5df35f05b7..86eb6d47dcc5 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c
>>> @@ -409,7 +409,6 @@ static int amdgpu_move_blit(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
>>> if (r) {
>>> goto error;
>>> } else if (wipe_fence) {
>>> - amdgpu_vram_mgr_set_cleared(bo->resource);
>> Mhm, that looks incorrect to me.
>>
>> Why don't we consider the resource cleared after it go wiped during eviction?
>
> Modifying the resource flag here doesn't go into effect until we call the drm_buddy_free_list() in amdgpu_vram_mgr_del(). This BO will be cleared once again after executing amdgpu_bo_release_notify(). With the new implementation, there's a chance that changing the resource flag the second time would cause the WARN_ON to occur. Hence I removed the resource cleared function call in amdgpu_move_blit. Thanks, Arun.
Something fishy is going on that we don't fully understand.
What happens here is that we move from VRAM to GTT, clear the VRAM BO after the move and set the flag.
When the BO is destroyed the it is backed by GTT and not VRAM any more, so no clear operation and no flag setting is performed.
It looks more like we forget to clear the flag in some cases.
Regards,
Christian.
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>> dma_fence_put(fence);
>>> fence = wipe_fence;
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.h
>>> index b256cbc2bc27..2c88d5fd87da 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.h
>>> @@ -66,7 +66,10 @@ to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_resource(struct ttm_resource *res)
>>>
>>> static inline void amdgpu_vram_mgr_set_cleared(struct ttm_resource *res)
>>> {
>>> - to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_resource(res)->flags |= DRM_BUDDY_CLEARED;
>>> + struct amdgpu_vram_mgr_resource *ares = to_amdgpu_vram_mgr_resource(res);
>>> +
>>> + WARN_ON(ares->flags & DRM_BUDDY_CLEARED);
>>> + ares->flags |= DRM_BUDDY_CLEARED;
>>> }
>>>
>>> #endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-02 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-01 19:08 [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Dirty cleared blocks on free Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2025-07-01 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/amdgpu: Reset the clear flag in buddy during resume Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2025-07-04 8:52 ` Matthew Auld
2025-07-08 6:10 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2025-07-01 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/buddy: Add a new unit test case for buffer clearance issue Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2025-07-02 7:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/amdgpu: Dirty cleared blocks on free Christian König
2025-07-02 11:58 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2025-07-02 13:41 ` Christian König [this message]
2025-07-03 7:13 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dda50b9d-1348-4fce-a513-c20e6223d58f@amd.com \
--to=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=matthew.brost@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).