From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/xen-front: Use Xen common shared buffer implementation Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 10:47:43 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20181130074205.20496-1-andr2000@gmail.com> <20181130074205.20496-2-andr2000@gmail.com> <3c69d924-11e1-7037-bfa5-276d22b245fe@gmail.com> <27491aa5-3548-4c39-13a2-132c738fae14@gmail.com> <71920419-f0ef-8489-35ff-ff8375cb7361@gmail.com> <686a8b1e-3588-32bc-abc7-79221dc9c74e@gmail.com> <19501fdd-eae6-295e-7394-777c25ea4cf1@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <19501fdd-eae6-295e-7394-777c25ea4cf1@oracle.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Boris Ostrovsky , jgross@suse.com Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Oleksandr Andrushchenko , Daniel Vetter , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org On 12/17/18 5:26 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: > On 12/17/18 10:03 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >> On 12/17/18 4:52 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 12/17/18 5:19 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote: >>>> Hello, Juergen, Boris! >>>> >>>> As this DRM part of the series is the only one which needs ack/nack >>>> >>>> (and it might take quite some time to complete) could we please >>>> >>>> merge the patches 1 and 3 now that already have ack/r-b? >>>> >>> >>> TBH I am not sure it makes sense to do this without the second patch. >>> Refactoring (and IIUIC this series is purely refactoring --- is it not?) >>> is done to reduce amount of code, and with only first and third patch we >>> end up with quite a significant increase in the number of LoC. (I am >>> going purely by diffstat) >>> >>> Of course, the other reason for refactoring is to eliminate code >>> duplication, but without second patch that will not happen. >> Agree, but this is the basis for the new pv camera frontend >> >> I am working on now [1], so even if we do not remove the code from DRM >> >> then we at least do not add it to the camera driver > > Since 1 and 3 are already ACKed you should be able to start the camera > series with these two patches as pre-requisites even if patch 2 is still > stalled by the time your camera code is posted (which I assume will be > 4.22 or later). Agreed, maybe by that time DRM part will also get its r-b/ack > > > -boris > > >>> -boris >> Thank you, >> >> Oleksandr >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/andr2000/linux/blob/camera_front_v1/drivers/media/xen/Kconfig#L6 >>