Re: [PATCH v3 01/14] dt-bindings: display/msm: dp-controller: Add sm6150

[Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 9/1/25 2:32 PM, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
> 
> On 8/28/2025 7:05 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>> On 28/08/2025 07:51, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/20/2025 6:18 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 05:34:43PM +0800, Xiangxu Yin wrote:
>>>>> Add DisplayPort controller for Qualcomm SM6150 SoC.
>>>>> While SM6150 currently shares the same configuration as SC7180,
>>>>> its hardware capabilities differ. Explicitly listing it ensures clarity
>>>>> and avoids potential issues if SC7180 support evolves in the future.
>>>> I assume, it has no MST support. Am I right?
>>>
>>>
>>>  From sm6150 ipcat, I found MST-related registers and pixel1 clk definition.
>>
>> Then please describe MST as the main difference between SM6150 and SC7180 (which doesn't have MST).
>>
>> Also this needs to be rebased on top of the MST bindings. I've picked up the latest posted revision, but basing on the on-list discussion I might need to drop it and post another iteration. 
>>
> 
> Would you prefer I keep the current patch and update the description of the
> MST capability difference with SC7180 in the commit message, or rebase on
> your series and update the dt-binding accordingly?
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250829-dp_mst_bindings-v7-0-2b268a43917b@oss.qualcomm.com
> 
> Since MST support is not yet mainlined in the DP driver, even if I rebase
> now, the final implementation may require redefining msm_dp_desc for
> SM6150 in both the dt-binding and the driver once MST lands.

dt-bindings must describe the hardware regardless of the current driver
functionality (which is unfortunately something we've not paid sufficient
attention to before and we're now untangling some messy files..)

Konrad