dri-devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>
To: Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd.de>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong assumptions in cea_for_each_detailed_block v2
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 04:39:34 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3aa7xu3kh.fsf@jhcloos.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EBF866F.1090805@digadd.de> (Christian Schmidt's message of "Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:57:19 +0100")

>>>>> "CS" == Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd.de> writes:

CS> The current logic misunderstands the spec about CEA 18byte descriptors.
CS> First, the spec doesn't state "detailed timing descriptors" but "18 byte
CS> descriptors", so any data record could be stored, mixed timings and
CS> other data, just as in the standard EDID.
CS> Second, the lower four bit of byte 3 of the CEA record do not contain
CS> the number of descriptors, but "the total number of DTDs defining native
CS> formats in the whole EDID [...], starting with the first DTD in the DTD
CS> list (which starts in the base EDID block)." A device can of course
CS> support non-native formats.

CS> As such the number can't be used to determine n, and the existing code
CS> will filter non-timing 18byte descriptors anyway.

CS> V2 removes an unused variable warning.

CS> Signed-off-by: Christian Schmidt <schmidt@digadd,de>

Tested-by: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>

Works fine here on top of Linus’ 7f80850d3f9f with a Radeon HD 4290 and
an hdmi-connected tv.

-JimC
-- 
James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>         OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6


CS> _______________________________________________
CS> dri-devel mailing list
CS> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
CS> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-11-15  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-13  8:57 [PATCH] Fix wrong assumptions in cea_for_each_detailed_block v2 Christian Schmidt
2011-11-14 22:53 ` Adam Jackson
2011-11-15  9:39 ` James Cloos [this message]
2011-11-15 12:40 ` Andy Furniss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3aa7xu3kh.fsf@jhcloos.com \
    --to=cloos@jhcloos.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=schmidt@digadd.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox