From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/21] drm/i915: Shut down PCH interrupts during irq_uninstall Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 10:44:22 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20110923085243.6e4b7b4c@jbarnes-x220> <1317344993-24945-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <1317344993-24945-3-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <20110930162048.GB2859@phenom.ffwll.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110930162048.GB2859@phenom.ffwll.local> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Dave Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:20:48 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Shouldn't we mask/ack south DE irqs before before we mask DE irqs to avoid > races, i.e. move this new code up? I don't know. What about the GT interrupts? I just stuck stuff at the bottom, figuring it would do the least harm... =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOhf/2Qp8BWwlsTdMRApNVAKCMHaUz6+YDK6Ov5W1wAY3ziKHxyACgqqPD fSBi3AF+Nu5vcOev97PrM4A= =Z+lo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--