From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Keith Packard Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: mark display port DPMS state as ON when enabling output Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 16:06:07 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1286138029-3728-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <89k77n$p47jkc@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1354337424==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <89k77n$p47jkc@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Chris Wilson , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1354337424== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 22:05:13 +0100, Chris Wilson = wrote: > It appears that all users (crtc and encoders) are tracking dpms_mode, in > one form or another. Should we move this to core? Sounds like a good idea. Would you prefer to do that yourself? > Is there any hardware that requires notification even when there is no > change? I don't know, but it seems unlikely. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMqQxfQp8BWwlsTdMRAviGAKDqQ+hvTAit+TijcNNLmfsJM/Bx6ACfYqsV /VG1X4eDf45bzAGlcwOdEl4= =99cy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============1354337424== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx --===============1354337424==--