Linux driver-core infrastructure
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 8/9] platform/chrome: Protect cros_ec_device lifecycle with revocable
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 13:02:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514160214.GH787748@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agVCoxuTu7l60TH-@google.com>

On Thu, May 14, 2026 at 03:33:55AM +0000, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:

> > Given you say this is such a bug I think you really should be sending
> > a series that is patches 5 through 7 from the other series and a
> > simple rwsem instead of misc_deregister_sync() to deal with this bug
> > ASAP. No need to complicate a simple bug fix in a driver with all
> > these core changes.
> 
> Apologies for missing this suggestion.
> 
> For "patches 5 through 7 from the other series" I guess you're referring:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260427134659.95181-6-tzungbi@kernel.org
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260427134659.95181-7-tzungbi@kernel.org
> - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260427134659.95181-8-tzungbi@kernel.org

Yes

> Could you provide a bit more detail on the rwsem approach?  I'm not
> entirely clear on what data or operations the rwsem would be protecting.

Just put a rwsem, or even scru, inside the driver's fops.

You can refactor that out to a misc or revocable later.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 10:54 [PATCH v10 0/9] drivers/base: Introduce revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 1/9] revocable: Revocable resource management Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-11 13:16   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12  8:12     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 2/9] revocable: Add KUnit test cases Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-11 13:10   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12  8:12     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 3/9] gpio: Add revocable provider handle for struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 4/9] gpio: cdev: Leverage revocable for accessing " Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 5/9] gpio: Remove gpio_chip_guard by using revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 6/9] gpio: Leverage revocable for accessing struct gpio_chip Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 7/9] gpio: Remove unused `chip` and `srcu` in struct gpio_device Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-11 13:18   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12  8:13     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-12 10:41       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 8/9] platform/chrome: Protect cros_ec_device lifecycle with revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-08 11:53   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-05-11 13:19     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-12  8:36     ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-05-14  3:33     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-14 16:02       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2026-05-08 10:54 ` [PATCH v10 9/9] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Consume cros_ec_device via revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-11 13:17 ` [PATCH v10 0/9] drivers/base: Introduce revocable Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260514160214.GH787748@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=brgl@kernel.org \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johan@kernel.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linusw@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox