From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Guixin Liu <kanie@linux.alibaba.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
Dan Williams <djbw@kernel.org>, Ira Weiny <iweiny@kernel.org>,
Li Ming <ming.li@zohomail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Shaikh Kamaluddin <shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com>,
linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] cxl/memdev: Fix poison debugfs vs unbind deadlock
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2026 18:30:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026091839-pennant-imperfect-0e46@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be97d805-94e7-48a0-9812-446d08dab7ce@intel.com>
On Fri, Sep 18, 2026 at 08:26:28AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>
>
> On 9/15/26 7:54 PM, Guixin Liu wrote:
> > Writing a memdev poison debugfs file while cxl_mem is being unbound
> > deadlocks. Patch 2 fixes it by not waiting for the device lock in those
> > handlers. Patch 1 adds the trylock guard it uses.
> >
> > Patch 2 does not build without patch 1, so the two need to travel
> > together.
> >
> > Testing:
> >
> > Reproduced on a QEMU CXL topology whose type3 devices advertise poison
> > inject support:
> >
> > while :; do echo 0 > /sys/kernel/debug/cxl/mem0/inject_poison; done &
> > while :; do
> > echo mem0 > /sys/bus/cxl/drivers/cxl_mem/unbind
> > echo mem0 > /sys/bus/cxl/drivers/cxl_mem/bind
> > done
> >
> > Without the fix the unbind wedges within seconds. The three tasks
> > involved, from /proc/<pid>/stack:
> >
> > writer, state S, holds the debugfs reference and waits for the lock
> > cxl_debugfs_poison_inject+0x25/0xa0 [cxl_mem]
> > debugfs_attr_write+0x61/0xb0
> > full_proxy_write+0xfc/0x1c0
> > vfs_write+0x1d4/0xe60
> >
> > unbind, state D, holds the lock and waits for the reference to drain
> > remove_one+0x27f/0x3d0
> > debugfs_remove+0x44/0x60
> > release_nodes+0xfa/0x2c0
> > devres_release_all+0x113/0x1a0
> > device_unbind_cleanup+0x76/0x260
> > device_release_driver_internal+0x3eb/0x540
> > unbind_store+0xde/0x100
> >
> > cxl_port workqueue, state D, blocked on the same lock
> > device_release_driver_internal+0x96/0x540
> > detach_memdev+0x79/0xb0 [cxl_core]
> > process_one_work+0x6b0/0xfb0
> >
> > The writer is in interruptible sleep and can be killed; the unbind
> > cannot, and because cxl_bus_wq is an ordered workqueue the wedged
> > detach_memdev() blocks every other CXL bus work item behind it.
> >
> > The same deadlock shows up with a pciehp hot-remove racing the writer
> > loop: the pciehp thread hits the same debugfs_remove() drain holding
> > the memdev lock, and the hot-remove wedges the same way. With both
> > patches applied the hot-remove flow completes normally.
> >
> > With both patches applied, 46 unbind/bind cycles against the same writer
> > loop all completed, no task was left in D state, and the writer collected
> > 10920 EBUSY returns from the contended trylock. Note that lockdep stays
> > quiet either way: one leg of the cycle is the debugfs active_users
> > completion rather than a lock it tracks.
> >
> > v3 -> v4:
> > - reword the patch 2 commit message per Alison: enumerate the teardown
> > paths that race a poison write into an unbind, and state that mixing
> > poison writes with cxl_mem teardown is not a supported use of this
> > debug ABI, though the fix keeps the cost of doing so to a failed write
> > - add the pciehp hot-remove reproduction, reported during v3 review,
> > to the patch 2 commit message
> > - collect Jonathan's Reviewed-by on both patches (no code change)
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> > - add the device_trylock() guard and use ACQUIRE(device_try, ...) instead
> > of open-coding device_trylock()/device_unlock(), keeping the style the
> > Fixes: commit established (Shaikh Kamaluddin)
> > - cut the changelog down to the failing condition, the consequence and
> > the fix; the call graph and the reproducer live here instead
> > - say how the issue was found and how it was tested
> >
> > v2 -> v3:
> > - rebase onto v7.3-rc2 (master), per Dave's request to send the series
> > against Linus's tags rather than cxl/next
> >
> > v1:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260826125248.4003792-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
> >
> > v2:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260831124809.889829-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
> >
> > v3:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/20260910094017.4032170-1-kanie@linux.alibaba.com/
> >
> > Guixin Liu (2):
> > driver core: Add conditional guard support for device_trylock()
> > cxl/memdev: Fix deadlock between poison debugfs and cxl_mem unbind
> >
> > drivers/cxl/mem.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> > include/linux/device.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
>
> For the series
> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
>
> Greg,
> I can take the patches through the CXL tree if you ack the first patch. Thanks!
Please do!
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-18 17:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-16 2:54 [PATCH v4 0/2] cxl/memdev: Fix poison debugfs vs unbind deadlock Guixin Liu
2026-09-16 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] driver core: Add conditional guard support for device_trylock() Guixin Liu
2026-09-16 2:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] cxl/memdev: Fix deadlock between poison debugfs and cxl_mem unbind Guixin Liu
2026-09-18 19:30 ` Alison Schofield
2026-09-18 15:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] cxl/memdev: Fix poison debugfs vs unbind deadlock Dave Jiang
2026-09-18 17:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2026-09-21 14:48 ` Dave Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026091839-pennant-imperfect-0e46@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=djbw@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=iweiny@kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kanie@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ming.li@zohomail.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=shaikhkamal2012@gmail.com \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox