Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] module: pull out add_taint_module() to be public

[Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse.com>]

On 9/4/26 2:19 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2026 at 11:25:01AM +0200, Petr Pavlu wrote:
>> On 9/4/26 7:10 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
>>> index d0e1e0bd2ad0..444d990c9983 100644
>>> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
>>> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c
>>> @@ -191,11 +191,21 @@ static inline int strong_try_module_get(struct module *mod)
>>>  		return -ENOENT;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static inline void add_taint_module(struct module *mod, unsigned flag,
>>> -				    enum lockdep_ok lockdep_ok)
>>> +/**
>>> + * add_taint_module: add a taint flag if not already set for a specific module
>>> + * @mod: pointer to the module that caused the problem
>>> + * @flag: one of the TAINT_* constants.
>>> + * @lockdep_ok: whether lock debugging is still OK.
>>> + *
>>> + * If something bad has gone wrong, you'll want @lockdebug_ok = false, but for
>>> + * some noteworthy-but-not-corrupting cases, it can be set to true.
>>
>> Nit: The final paragraph is mostly copied from the description of
>> add_taint() but I don't think it is quite right. The parameter name
>> should be lockdep_ok, not lockdebug_ok and the values are
>> LOCKDEP_STILL_OK / LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE, not true / false.
>>
>> I suggest updating this part for both add_taint() and add_taint_module()
>> to something like:
>>
>>  * Use @lockdep_ok = LOCKDEP_NOW_UNRELIABLE if something serious has gone wrong.
>>  * For noteworthy but non-corrupting cases, use LOCKDEP_STILL_OK instead.
> 
> How about I add another patch to the series that fixes up the
> documentation for both functions?  They both should be fixed up and I
> might as well get them in sync properly.

Makes sense to me.

-- 
Thanks,
Petr