From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E520F29B781; Thu, 28 May 2026 23:10:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780009808; cv=none; b=qoBuPPR6CcK+exkfMxSNT6vSeGVUFoHx+e9Fug8x4xLmifdH5MdTvr18YbJX4ZSqXwyyI386R/wareLbRXwN2AfrZ8odHMerRtdPFArciy1bmSwBJO7qkHrcX63fr4jaBwHzvoENPbomXrKmaumj/6jx154sdhokP76yal/7aC8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780009808; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9LP0QLM69aPKp1pf7AkStTgT46yv7pJoK/Jy+fqreSw=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:To:From:Subject: References:In-Reply-To; b=TfoUk8ts5u1M5Be1cb9lJXMAwvNJpGRVIeFShxCFpkIOYLzfYxaorQtrhzolfhZgeO7rZLrL6QVOo/ft/T/uDCAKgul0MCon+Py7sb+MCurjGP9LkfMuz0fnsuk512mQy/A02v3Sz0O+HDhM+KEv9BXqZusP5JNp3dUgewaQhzI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=J1I53B0p; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="J1I53B0p" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CF381F000E9; Thu, 28 May 2026 23:10:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1780009807; bh=9LP0QLM69aPKp1pf7AkStTgT46yv7pJoK/Jy+fqreSw=; h=Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=J1I53B0pX4A4Ry7I/eSVar0qwZDRyAiS8jyXPVK7yFwIZupFQfxkNDIKaQhMecE3U zTNJtHPIQROvh7n4F8gsbMqgqFdTv22Gni7O3FKKh+1WNBQH8mth/1qQnaIBK+Hjet 4FaVkM4PYXJp2XbFjA7KofuQIIg7nHU+M4e43C8wt+krfDdX1sfgIo7O2FxU3Vpzk9 VRpVat5MrIaoJNxXBfjRDVgHVwRLXjtIFixEMfyaLIV/3wxkoafH9PQnpA5QIusEVZ qIwTwE033mIAHgIC4QbT/Pde759Ezl85hMKX9sSLtZoRVyV12mHViA56LRICM2TpCx tt1jRjdPizveg== Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: driver-core@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 01:10:03 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , To: "Gary Guo" From: "Danilo Krummrich" Subject: Re: [PATCH] rust: devres: add 'static bound to Devres References: <20260526000447.350558-1-dakr@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: On Wed May 27, 2026 at 9:49 PM CEST, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > That said if you feel strongly about it, I don't mind moving the 'static = bound > to new() too much. Keeping the bound on the struct for now, given that we agree to move it if = it creeps to more places off-list.