From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "syzbot" <syzbot@kernel.org>
Cc: <syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>, <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Luis Chamberlain" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Russ Weight" <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <syzbot@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] firmware_loader: Fix recursive lock in device_cache_fw_images()
Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2026 21:35:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJ3X585GG3FJ.2OS0MKDAZPK61@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48b092a5-f49d-48a4-95f4-f65bebfc6bc3@mail.kernel.org>
On Fri May 29, 2026 at 5:09 PM CEST, syzbot wrote:
> From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
>
> A recursive locking deadlock can occur in the firmware loader's power
> management notification handler.
>
> During system suspend or hibernation preparation, fw_pm_notify() calls
> device_cache_fw_images(). This function acquires fw_lock to set the
> firmware cache state to FW_LOADER_START_CACHE and then iterates over all
> devices using dpm_for_each_dev() while still holding the lock.
>
> For each device, dev_cache_fw_image() schedules asynchronous work to cache
> the firmware. If memory allocation for the async work entry fails (e.g., in
> out-of-memory conditions), async_schedule_node_domain() falls back to
> executing the work function synchronously in the current thread.
>
> The synchronous execution path (__async_dev_cache_fw_image() ->
> cache_firmware() -> request_firmware() -> assign_fw()) attempts to acquire
> fw_lock again. Since the current thread already holds fw_lock, this results
> in a recursive locking deadlock.
>
> Fix this by releasing fw_lock immediately after updating the cache state
> and before calling dpm_for_each_dev(). The lock is only needed to protect
> the state update. Concurrent firmware requests will correctly see the
> FW_LOADER_START_CACHE state and use the piggyback mechanism, which is
> independently protected by its own fwc->name_lock.
>
> Fixes: ac39b3ea73aa ("firmware loader: let caching firmware piggyback on loading firmware")
> Assisted-by: Gemini:gemini-3.1-pro-preview Gemini:gemini-3-flash-preview syzbot
> Reported-by: syzbot+e70e4c6f6eee43357ba7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e70e4c6f6eee43357ba7
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/ai_job?id=8b4af9fd-24af-423f-8acb-1159fd34c1a5
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
I think Sashiko found an orthogonal issue that looks valid at a first glance, in
case you are interested to dig in further.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/48b092a5-f49d-48a4-95f4-f65bebfc6bc3%40mail.kernel.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-08 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-29 15:09 [PATCH v2] firmware_loader: Fix recursive lock in device_cache_fw_images() syzbot
2026-06-08 19:35 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2026-06-08 19:35 ` Danilo Krummrich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJ3X585GG3FJ.2OS0MKDAZPK61@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
--cc=syzbot@kernel.org \
--cc=syzbot@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox