From: "Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>
To: "Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>
Cc: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Eliot Courtney" <ecourtney@nvidia.com>,
"nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev" <nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>,
"gary@garyguo.net" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"dakr@kernel.org" <dakr@kernel.org>,
"rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org" <rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org>,
"driver-core@lists.linux.dev" <driver-core@lists.linux.dev>,
"ojeda@kernel.org" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"russ.weight@linux.dev" <russ.weight@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] gpu: nova-core: transition booter_load to TLV images
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:51:25 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJTQH2CGKDMW.1LVUEN7V32OK8@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a3b7dcc404d857531972ac52623e63620d117cc1.camel@nvidia.com>
On Thu Jul 9, 2026 at 5:46 AM JST, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Mon, 2026-07-06 at 15:31 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>>
>> > + let os_data_offset = tlv.get_u32(b"DAOF")?;
>> > + let os_data_size = tlv.get_u32(b"DASZ")?;
>> > + let os_code_offset = tlv.get_u32(b"CDOF")?;
>> > + let os_code_size = tlv.get_u32(b"CDSZ")?;
>> > + let patch_loc = tlv.get_u32(b"PLOC")?;
>> > + let fuse_version = tlv.get_u32(b"FUSE")?;
>> > + let engine_id = tlv.get_u32(b"ENID")?;
>> > + let ucode_id = tlv.get_u32(b"UCID")?;
>> > + let app0_code_offset = tlv.get_u32(b"A0CO")?;
>> > + let app0_code_size = tlv.get_u32(b"A0CS")?;
>> > + let num_sigs = tlv.get_u32(b"NSIG")?;
>> > + let sig_bytes = tlv.get_bytes(b"SIGN")?;
>> > +
>> > + // Booter is always signed
>>
>> The `.rst` file mentions the non-signed case though - we should
>> reconcile the spec and the code one way or the other.
>
> The .rst does not mention that Booter is signed, only that if the firmware is unsigned, then NSIG is
> 0 and SIGN does not exist. And since get_bytes() now returns Error if SIGN doesn't exist, we
> enforce that here.
>
> But you're right in that it does feel a little off. That's one of the reasons I had get_nth() in v1
> -- to streamline getting the nth signature.
>
> What do you think about adding a get_signature(index) method that combines parsing NSIG and SIGN,
> automatically calculating sig_size and returning Option<&[u8]> ?
That would make sense to me, yes. The current ad-hoc code is rather
messy and having it in a separate method would definitely help with that.
Do you mean to make it a method of `Tlv` or `BooterFirmware`? The latter
looks more adequate for the time being, as AFAIK Booter is the only user
of this signature.
>
>>
>> >
>> > + // The size of one signature
>> > + let sig_size = sig_bytes
>> > + .len()
>> > + .checked_div(num_sigs.into_safe_cast())
>> > + .ok_or(EINVAL)?;
>> > +
>> > + // Extract the nth signature
>> > + let sig_chunk = sig_bytes
>> > + .chunks_exact(sig_size)
>>
>> As Sashiko pointed out, this will panic if `sig_size == 0`, so we need
>> to check that - and whether an unsigned Booter is valid at all.
>
> sig_size cannot be 0 because of this:
>
> if !(1..=15).contains(&num_sigs) || sig_bytes.len() % num_sigs != 0 {
>
> Neither sig_bytes.len() nor num_sigs can be 0.
>
> But IMHO, this just reinforces the idea that I should add get_signature().
Yes, that would keep all the conditions we need to track local to a much
smaller code block. Please also check my other reply [1] for further
potential improvements.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/DJTQAZCXYPN7.3Q0B4NH8EA8BO@nvidia.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-09 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-02 19:27 [PATCH v3 0/7] Transition Nova Core to TLV firmare images Timur Tabi
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] rust: firmware: add request_into_buf() Timur Tabi
2026-07-03 2:51 ` Alvin Sun
2026-07-03 3:06 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-03 13:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-06 6:30 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-06 10:50 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-07 2:54 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-07 5:10 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-07 13:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] gpu: nova-core: add TLV parser for firmware files Timur Tabi
2026-07-02 19:45 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-06 6:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-07 2:56 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-07 5:13 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-08 22:48 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-09 3:43 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-06 6:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-08 20:12 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-09 1:55 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] gpu: nova-core: transition booter_load to TLV images Timur Tabi
2026-07-06 6:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-08 20:46 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-09 3:51 ` Alexandre Courbot [this message]
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] gpu: nova-core: transition gsp " Timur Tabi
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] gpu: nova-core: transition gen_bootloader " Timur Tabi
2026-07-06 6:31 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-08 22:26 ` Timur Tabi
2026-07-09 2:24 ` Alexandre Courbot
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] gpu: nova-core: transition fsp " Timur Tabi
2026-07-02 19:27 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] gpu: nova-core: update firmware module info for " Timur Tabi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJTQH2CGKDMW.1LVUEN7V32OK8@nvidia.com \
--to=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ecourtney@nvidia.com \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=nova-gpu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox