From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793788833; b=AChHRBJQ9eXHZu44tsnlvP+RZiyJJfo3VUF6K7WAyLcC6h1h/D4EYboyTlYlt2xRt7eA gnHoH6YwHSVFP2JJC9kD8flJ57dCO0+DYTtanjqoXIK6TmBNc3wyZjQZ1C9uBdG8cFLtJ 4LwsSRKLbXtjqYAvmpBWup/gNTxvnjed4zUVHLHcAZgWUc5jFQLgVqMivN5AD4Cu8kdmY ZuERU6J+sTFQ6KrvZyLaQJVpYbqn2flrvdtx3R2TinpxZXKIftXEabGypy7VVK6uj9w5C 30H4NP+MJspSzQtz9cb0gJSC7S0Am7ngwjhtMAxo0edXInmi3Vj+nAG8dbqaKnHE78g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793788833; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=OHhrH3mVCZL9F+uul7Pko5LwqezUEkg/0ds9TVqWkW0=; b=5RCWKwpjtnQej81oKuXr8ZjP/iYBhJ+bR/n4dfeV3oC9HScPGN1n+pBg7lwSuqfM268Q CjiIM2eyt2qlqWTeKcKsj+mBOJzWWSZkTH7mnWd2kHIa50BMOe+nHct7kvhIPx4TRAqRl G+Bj40VgCgDtrN/gXoMe9m/KqJgOGA63212Crij/2wQCRmTww0Ktr+SlwQXUs8Wuq6prl gGhUgKTTFaALbD8QyFV+bRNVvFEr/iMauy++nX6dKNH2XDjkCIcp1hkEb6OKeE8+ub4Dr /0GwkXDi9/qkZM148YVmgeA3HlzQy3k/gYw926fQ0v51ZqgX2vFNE8P0/iMCFIxeuWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EeMZhO8D; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=100.103.45.18 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (quasi.space.kernel.org [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7936606A31B; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 10:40:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k20260515 header.b=EeMZhO8D Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 962121F000C1; Wed, 4 Nov 2026 10:40:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1793788832; bh=OHhrH3mVCZL9F+uul7Pko5LwqezUEkg/0ds9TVqWkW0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=EeMZhO8DjG4Z1LNGDG6wdfrR5/jvvahFgvuj3m7HOQrS5HMxi/U+6lT8CdBS1mQBG IC79mPKN5pooYxKGcfp/3nadOdWf8Fym3XSVAO968hO1SW6hTg6elGvzxmkBPwmNaS v9T63ChJrQAQbad0an5kGXooCbmvv9MDXmPvDoorGg+XyLiYGBnkViAIHcypGwqbpJ ppQezfycclcHYH/cH5pj6vY3QPZi1ua1tE+LaTlont55dEIEeB+v8CFlcxuVMlA3hL myTh9yVFL8UBjo6Snz+ghL8sE2j0/RkU7G36RxL7WrUdRykGnhNHAiwYwIXZ3Ksf2n rYu3AjolMYkzw== Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2026 12:40:16 +0200 From: Mike Rapoport To: Breno Leitao Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Ilias Apalodimas , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrew Morton , David Hildenbrand , Lorenzo Stoakes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Vlastimil Babka , Suren Baghdasaryan , Michal Hocko , Miaohe Lin , Naoya Horiguchi , Oscar Salvador , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Mark Rutland , kas@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, Brendan Jackman , Johannes Weiner , Zi Yan , shakeel.butt@linux.dev, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, rmikey@meta.com, riel@surriel.com, harry@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/7] mm/memory-failure: add hwpoison_boot_page() to flag an inherited frame Message-ID: References: <20261016-hwpoison-kho-v6-0-f304255147da@debian.org> <20261016-hwpoison-kho-v6-3-f304255147da@debian.org> X-Mailing-List: driver-core@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:49:44AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 08:59:59PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 02:06:17AM -0800, Breno Leitao wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 03, 2026 at 11:48:43AM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > > --- a/mm/internal.h > > > > > +++ b/mm/internal.h > > > > > > > > We've been splitting internal.h to smaller headers, maybe it's time to add > > > > "memory-faulure.h"? > > > > > > Ack. I'm happy to move the "mm/memory-failure.c" section out of > > > mm/internal.h into a new mm/memory-failure.h, as preparation for this > > > patch. > > > > > > Since this patchset is moving slowly, I'll start the header split in > > > parallel as a separate series, and rebase this patchset on top of it > > > when I respin. Is it this ok? > > > > Sounds good to me. > > > > Just be aware that MM folks are knee deep into fixes this cycle, so both > > sets could be moving slowly :) > > Appreciate the heads up. In that case, should I hold off on the header > split until the next cycle instead of starting it now? I believe one header split patch is small enough and not controversial to have it this cycle. > Thanks, > --breno -- Sincerely yours, Mike.