Linux driver-core infrastructure
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Yu <tao1.yu@intel.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, dakr@kernel.org,
	driver-core@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rafael@kernel.org,
	syzbot+c22bb42560ec86726aba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	tao1.yu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: avoid blocking allocation while holding uevent_sock_mutex
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2026 15:17:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <reply-20260826-kobject-uevent-v1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026082632-sports-cattail-a5b0@gregkh>

Hi Greg,

Thanks for the review.

Nothing changed in USB enumeration itself. What syzbot appears to be
hitting is a long-standing latency problem in the untagged uevent path,
not a recent USB-specific regression.

The blocked task is in:

  usb_set_configuration()
    -> device_add()
    -> kobject_uevent_env()
    -> uevent_net_broadcast_untagged()

so the contention point is the global untagged-uevent broadcast path in
lib/kobject_uevent.c.

Looking at the history, the locked allocation/broadcast pattern appears
to date back to 16dff336b33d ("kobject: add kobject_uevent_net_broadcast()").
Because of that, I did not add a Fixes tag or cc stable in v1. I do not
have evidence that this is a recent regression, so I would rather not
add those tags without a stronger justification.

You are also right about the race in my listener pre-check. A listener
can appear after the first unlock, so that part of v1 is not correct.
I will drop that approach in the next revision.

I also should have included the syzbot link and testing details. The
report is here:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=c22bb42560ec86726aba

syzbot has now tested the proposed patch and reported that the
reproducer did not trigger the issue:
https://groups.google.com/g/syzkaller-bugs/c/q6wmyA-hG6E/m/rLDsbLC-AQAJ

So the patch now has:
Tested-by: syzbot+c22bb42560ec86726aba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

I also compile-tested it with:
  make lib/kobject_uevent.o

Given the race in v1, I will respin this as a narrower fix and include
the proper Link/Tested-by information.

Thanks,
Tao

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-26  7:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-26  6:46 [PATCH] kobject: avoid blocking allocation while holding uevent_sock_mutex Tao Yu
2026-08-26  7:01 ` Greg KH
2026-08-26  7:17   ` Tao Yu [this message]
2026-08-26  7:28     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=reply-20260826-kobject-uevent-v1@intel.com \
    --to=tao1.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+c22bb42560ec86726aba@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox