From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>, dtrace@lists.linux.dev
Cc: dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] dtrace: add tcp provider
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 20:02:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <148eabc7-ee00-33fe-b013-0f48fda0163a@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fb5b1e66-a2a5-4dd1-8c58-2477b1ca6894@oracle.com>
On 7/2/25 11:06, Alan Maguire wrote:
> On 02/07/2025 00:16, Eugene Loh wrote:
>> On most VMs,
>> test/unittest/tcp/tst.ipv4remotetcp.sh
>> test/unittest/tcp/tst.ipv4remotetcpstate.sh
>> xfail due to missing remote. Are we okay with "shrugging our shoulders"
>> like that?
> Yeah, I don't think the remote test is robust enough. Specifically in
> OCI it seems to always fail. I'd suggest we replace it with creating a
> network namespace with IP addresses configured on top of veths to
> simulate the remote case, the codepaths will be the same. I've done this
> in other test suites and it works well.
Sounds great (if "we" is "you", haha).
>> Meanwhile, my one non-OCI VM ran those tests. The first test passes.
>> The second one consistently reports
>> -tcp:::state-change to time-wait - yes
>> +tcp:::state-change to time-wait - no
> I hit some of these failure during development; adding the
> fbt::tcp_time_wait:entry probe helped. Is that inlined or something
> perhaps (grep tcp_time_wait /proc/kallsyms)?
On the VM in question:
# grep -w tcp_time_wait /proc/kallsyms
ffffffff92ad25b0 T tcp_time_wait
# dtrace -lP fbt |& grep tcp_time_wait
49373 fbt vmlinux tcp_time_wait return
49372 fbt vmlinux tcp_time_wait entry
# dtrace -lP rawfbt |& grep tcp_time_wait
51079 rawfbt vmlinux tcp_time_wait return
51078 rawfbt vmlinux tcp_time_wait entry
>> and occasionally reports stuff like
>> dtrace: error in dt_clause_2 for probe ID 4976 (tcp:vmlinux::send):
>> invalid address (0x1fc0c0000000000) at BPF pc 287
>> dtrace: error in dt_clause_2 for probe ID 4976 (tcp:vmlinux::send):
>> invalid address (0x225b80000000000) at BPF pc 287
>>
> ah, ok there must be a null deref somewhere. Haven't seen this before;
> what kernel version/arch is this?
5.15.0-300.161.13.el9uek.x86_64
FWIW, I can comment out all probes in tcp other than:
{ "send", DTRACE_PROBESPEC_NAME,
"rawfbt::ip_send_unicast_reply:entry" },
Then I run
dtrace -c "$testdir/client.ip.pl tcp $dest $tcpport" -qn 'tcp:::send
/args[2]->ip_saddr == "'$source'"/ { tcpsend++; }'
The disassembly shows that I look up args[2] using dt_bvar_args()
(including checking for a fault). Then we try to dereference
args[2]->ip_saddr. We first check the pointer is non NULL. Then we
call dt_cg_load_scalar() to bpf_probe_read() from the desired location.
This call is problematic.
>> The non-remote tests fail on OL8 UEK6 (x86 and arm).
>> dtrace: failed to compile script /dev/stdin:
>> ".../build/dlibs/5.2/tcp.d", line 177: failed to resolve type of
>> inet_ntoa arg#1 (ipaddr_t *):
>> Unknown type name
>>
> This is a weird failure; I see it on some systems but not on others.
> In tcp.d we have
>
> #pragma D depends_on library net.d
>
> which contains the typedef for ipaddr_t ; it seems that's not enough to
> pull in the typedef reliably. I suspect there is a timing element
> involved here in when the net.d library is included. Perhaps there is a
> better way to define ipaddr_t ; would using a builtin typedef in
> _dtrace_typedefs_32/64 work better perhaps?
Don't know.
>> The probe names are
>> tcp:ip:*:* Solaris
>> tcp:vmlinux:*:* DTv1
>> tcp:vmlinux::* with this patch (that is, no more function)
>> I guess precedents have already been set for other SDT providers; so,
>> okay. Just noting for my own sake.
>> Meanwhile, the typed args[] have changed in number and type from Solaris> to DTv1 to this patch. Does that merit discussion?
> Hmm, that's not intentional (aside from the additional INBOUND/OUTBOUND
> etc which we use to help inform translation).
Worth mentioning somewhere?
> Do you see other changes aside from them? Thanks!
This is what I have for typed args[] for tcp probes.
The typed probe arguments for probes
accept-[refused|established]
connect-[refused|established|request]
receive
are the same as for send.
The typed probe arguments for state-change may be different.
So, the typed probe arguments are (wide screen, fixed-width font):
args[0]: args[1]: args[2]: args[3]: args[4]:
args[5]: args[6]: args[7]:
send Solaris pktinfo_t * csinfo_t * ipinfo_t *
tcpsinfo_t * tcpinfo_t *
send DTv1 (unknown) (unknown) (unknown)
(unknown) (unknown) (unknown) int int
send DTv2 pktinfo_t * csinfo_t * ipinfo_t *
tcpsinfo_t * tcpinfo_t * int tcplsinfo_t * int
state-change Solaris void csinfo_t * void
tcpsinfo_t * void tcplsinfo_t *
state-change DTv1 (unknown) (unknown) (unknown)
(unknown) (unknown) (unknown) int int
state-change DTv2 void * csinfo_t * void *
tcpsinfo_t * void * void * tcplsinfo_t * int
Here, "DTv1" refers to legacy DTrace on Linux. I guess we can ignore
that. By "DTv2" I mean your patch. For state-change, Solaris calls
some things "void" (not "void *") and tcplsinfo_t* moves from args[5] to
args[6].
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-03 0:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-10 13:58 [PATCH v2 0/4] DTrace TCP provider Alan Maguire
2025-06-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] dtrace: move get_member() to dt_cg.c Alan Maguire
2025-07-01 18:23 ` Eugene Loh
2025-06-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] dt_impl: bump number of TSLOTS to 8 Alan Maguire
2025-07-01 18:31 ` Eugene Loh
2025-07-02 14:52 ` Alan Maguire
2025-07-02 20:22 ` Eugene Loh
2025-07-03 15:18 ` Alan Maguire
2025-06-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] dtrace: add tcp provider Alan Maguire
2025-07-01 23:16 ` Eugene Loh
2025-07-02 15:06 ` Alan Maguire
2025-07-03 0:02 ` Eugene Loh [this message]
2025-07-03 15:03 ` Alan Maguire
2025-07-03 15:29 ` Kris Van Hees
2025-07-03 15:38 ` Kris Van Hees
2025-07-03 19:55 ` Eugene Loh
2025-07-07 18:44 ` Kris Van Hees
2025-06-10 13:58 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] dtrace: sync dlibs with tcp.d, ip.d and net.d changes Alan Maguire
2025-07-01 19:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] DTrace TCP provider Eugene Loh
2025-07-01 19:27 ` Kris Van Hees
2025-07-02 14:52 ` Alan Maguire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=148eabc7-ee00-33fe-b013-0f48fda0163a@oracle.com \
--to=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox