Re: [PATCH 26/38] test: Annotate xfail (chill not implemented yet)

Kris Van Hees
2024-07-19T21:12:26Z

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 01:38:52AM -0400, eugene.loh@oracle.com wrote:
> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>

Before I can really assess whether the annotation is valid, I'd like to know
why chill) is even used here. I.e. I don't quite understand the test :)
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
> ---
> test/unittest/speculation/tst.zerosize.d | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/unittest/speculation/tst.zerosize.d b/test/unittest/speculation/tst.zerosize.d
> index 56c1fcea..996f1257 100644
> --- a/test/unittest/speculation/tst.zerosize.d
> +++ b/test/unittest/speculation/tst.zerosize.d
> @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
> * http://oss.oracle.com/licenses/upl.
> */
>
> -/* @@xfail: dtv2 */
> +/* @@xfail: dtv2, chill not implemented yet */
>
> #pragma D option destructive
>
> --
> 2.18.4
>