public inbox for dtrace@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eugene.loh@oracle.com
To: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] Optimize USDT discovery a little
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 02:03:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250625060305.15707-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (raw)

From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>

We want to reduce the performance cost of USDT discovery if possible.

Specifically, a number of statements -- with probe descriptions such as
"dtrace:::BEGIN" that could never specify USDT probes -- will not get
their clause flags set with DT_CLSFLAG_USDT_EXCLUDE.  So these statements
get considered unnecessarily during periodic probe discovery.

Therefore:

*)  Expand ignore_clause(dtp, n, uprp) to support the case uprp==NULL.
    This case is independent of any knowledge of a specific underlying
    probe.

*)  During probe discovery, check ignore_clause(dtp, i, NULL).  This
    sets the DT_CLSFLAG_USDT_[INCLUDE|EXCLUDE] flag and allows faster
    exclusion of statements that do not need to be reconsidered.

To take advantage of this optimization, users should specify providers.
E.g., instead of "BEGIN" (which could conceivably be a USDT probe),
specify "dtrace:::BEGIN".

Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
---
 libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
index cf5cfd431..5ba50b678 100644
--- a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
+++ b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
@@ -504,7 +504,8 @@ clean_usdt_probes(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
 
 /*
  * Judge whether clause "n" could ever be called as a USDT probe
- * for this underlying probe.
+ * for this underlying probe.  We can pass uprp==NULL to see if
+ * the clause can be excluded for every probe.
  */
 static int
 ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
@@ -512,6 +513,9 @@ ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
 	dtrace_stmtdesc_t	*stp = dtp->dt_stmts[n];
 	dtrace_probedesc_t	*pdp = &stp->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe;
 
+	if (stp == NULL)
+		return 1;
+
 	/*
 	 * Some clauses could never be called for a USDT probe,
 	 * regardless of the underlying probe uprp.  Cache this
@@ -525,7 +529,7 @@ ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
 		 * neither '*' nor a digit, it cannot be a USDT probe.
 		 */
 		if (len > 1) {
-			char	lastchar = pdp->prv[len - 1];
+			char	lastchar = (pdp->prv[0] != '\0' ? pdp->prv[len - 1] : '*');
 
 			if (lastchar != '*' && !isdigit(lastchar)) {
 				dt_stmt_clsflag_set(stp, DT_CLSFLAG_USDT_EXCLUDE);
@@ -555,6 +559,8 @@ ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
 	}
 	if (dt_stmt_clsflag_test(stp, DT_CLSFLAG_USDT_EXCLUDE) == 1)
 		return 1;
+	if (uprp == NULL)
+		return 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * If we cannot ignore this statement, try to use uprp.
@@ -751,13 +757,9 @@ static int discover(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
 	 */
 	memset(&pcb, 0, sizeof(dt_pcb_t));
 	for (i = 0; i < dtp->dt_stmt_nextid; i++) {
-		dtrace_stmtdesc_t *stp;
-
-		stp = dtp->dt_stmts[i];
-		if (stp == NULL)
+		if (ignore_clause(dtp, i, NULL))
 			continue;
-		if (dt_stmt_clsflag_test(stp, DT_CLSFLAG_USDT_EXCLUDE) != 1)
-			dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(&stp->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb);
+		dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(&dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
-- 
2.43.5


             reply	other threads:[~2025-06-25  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-25  6:03 eugene.loh [this message]
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] Sync up the version numbers eugene.loh
2025-07-22 10:51   ` [DTrace-devel] " Nick Alcock
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] test: Add test for predefined preprocessor definitions eugene.loh
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Extend the USDT bit mask to multiple words eugene.loh
2025-07-22 12:34   ` Nick Alcock
2025-07-23  0:47     ` Eugene Loh
2025-06-25  6:03 ` [PATCH] test: Extend timeout for many-pids test eugene.loh
2025-07-22 12:44   ` Nick Alcock
2025-07-22 10:45 ` [PATCH v2] Optimize USDT discovery a little Nick Alcock

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250625060305.15707-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    --to=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox