From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
To: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: eugene.loh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] proc: more self-grab improvements
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 12:58:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878qsus2uv.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87frn43mqq.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (Nick Alcock's message of "Tue, 03 Dec 2024 13:43:57 +0000")
On 3 Dec 2024, Nick Alcock uttered the following:
> On 3 Dec 2024, Nick Alcock outgrape:
>> This has survived a thousand iterations of test/unittest/proc/tst.self-grab.sh
>> and test/unittest/usdt/tst.multitrace.sh with no failures (after the other
>> patches in this series are applied).
>
> Also survived internals/libproc tests (just making sure I didn't break
> grabbing in a more fundamental way):
>
> 1300 cases (1100 PASS, 0 FAIL, 0 XPASS, 200 XFAIL, 0 SKIP)
>
> (and survived a more conventional full test run as well).
Survived test runs on the usual 8x OCI systems too.
Did nonstop runs on them overnight of libproc internals tests,
proc/tst.self-grab.sh, and usdt/tst.multitrace.sh. No failures :)
Even proc/tst.signals.sh seems to be consistently passing now,
and that's another unstable-marked nasty test I hadn't got round to
looking at in ever so long...
--
NULL && (void)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-05 12:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-03 11:36 [PATCH 0/5] fix test/unittest/usdt/tst.multitrace.sh Nick Alcock
2024-12-03 11:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] Revert "Tweak self-armouring" Nick Alcock
2024-12-07 4:37 ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-12-03 11:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] proc: more self-grab improvements Nick Alcock
2024-12-03 13:43 ` Nick Alcock
2024-12-05 12:58 ` Nick Alcock [this message]
2024-12-05 13:43 ` [DTrace-devel] " Nick Alcock
2024-12-07 4:38 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-12-03 11:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] libproc: debugging improvements Nick Alcock
2024-12-07 4:38 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-12-03 11:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] libproc: guard against Puntrace() of terminated processes Nick Alcock
2024-12-03 18:06 ` [DTrace-devel] " Nick Alcock
2024-12-03 18:09 ` Nick Alcock
2024-12-07 4:38 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-12-03 11:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] libproc: drop Pgrab() special cases in Ptrace() Nick Alcock
2024-12-07 4:40 ` Kris Van Hees
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878qsus2uv.fsf@esperi.org.uk \
--to=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox