From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
To: "eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, eugene.loh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] test: Increase syscall entry timeout
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:56:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy2v2oz8.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122220154.20552-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (eugene loh's message of "Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:01:54 -0500")
On 22 Jan 2026, eugene loh outgrape:
> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
>
> The run time for this test seems twice as long for aarch64 as for
> x86_64. Further, the run time seems to have jumped significantly from
> kernel 5.15 to 6.12 and then again to kernel 6.18. E.g.,
Ew.
> x86_64 aarch64
> 5.15 7 secs 18 secs
> 6.12 12 secs 33 secs
> 6.18 22 secs 54 secs
>
> Looking at a run on the 6.18 aarch64 system, the time is basically
> spent in the dtrace_close() call to dt_probe_detach_all(), which does:
>
> for (prp = ...)
> prp->prov->impl->detach(dtp, prp);
>
> Then, dt_tp_probe_detach() calls dt_tp_detach(), which does:
>
> close(tpp->fd);
>
> This close() averages over 0.1 secs. For hundreds of syscall probes,
> we get nearly a minute of run time, exceeding the default test timeout.
Sounds like another O(n^2) crept back in somewhere in the kernel :(
> For the time being, increase the timeout on this test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 12:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-22 22:01 [PATCH] test: Increase syscall entry timeout eugene.loh
2026-01-27 12:56 ` Nick Alcock [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cy2v2oz8.fsf@esperi.org.uk \
--to=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox