public inbox for dtrace@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>
To: "eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, eugene.loh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] test: Increase syscall entry timeout
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 12:56:43 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy2v2oz8.fsf@esperi.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260122220154.20552-1-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (eugene loh's message of "Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:01:54 -0500")

On 22 Jan 2026, eugene loh outgrape:

> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
>
> The run time for this test seems twice as long for aarch64 as for
> x86_64.  Further, the run time seems to have jumped significantly from
> kernel 5.15 to 6.12 and then again to kernel 6.18.  E.g.,

Ew.

>                   x86_64     aarch64
>     5.15          7 secs     18 secs
>     6.12         12 secs     33 secs
>     6.18         22 secs     54 secs
>
> Looking at a run on the 6.18 aarch64 system, the time is basically
> spent in the dtrace_close() call to dt_probe_detach_all(), which does:
>
>     for (prp = ...)
>         prp->prov->impl->detach(dtp, prp);
>
> Then, dt_tp_probe_detach() calls dt_tp_detach(), which does:
>
>     close(tpp->fd);
>
> This close() averages over 0.1 secs.  For hundreds of syscall probes,
> we get nearly a minute of run time, exceeding the default test timeout.

Sounds like another O(n^2) crept back in somewhere in the kernel :(

> For the time being, increase the timeout on this test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>

Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock@oracle.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-01-27 12:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-22 22:01 [PATCH] test: Increase syscall entry timeout eugene.loh
2026-01-27 12:56 ` Nick Alcock [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cy2v2oz8.fsf@esperi.org.uk \
    --to=nick.alcock@oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox