public inbox for dtrace@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: "eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev,  eugene.loh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH 15/19] Ignore clauses: some clauses are impossible regardless of uprp
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:31:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikvjf4ua.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829052558.3525-15-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (eugene loh's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:25:54 -0400")

"eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com> writes:

> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
>
> In ignore_clauses, for an underlying probe uprp, we try to
> decide if we can safely ignore clause n.
>
> Meanwhile, for some clauses, the probe description tells us the
> clause will not be called for any USDT probe, regardless of the
> underlying probe.  For example, "syscall::write:" can safely be
> ignored, for all uprp.
>
> Add a dtsd_usdt variable to each statement to track status:

Not that it really matters here, but I wonder why not an enum?

>
>     USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED  not yet initialized
>
>     USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE       clause could possibly be called
>                              for some USDT probe
>
>     USDT_FLAG_IGNORE         clause can safely be ignored for
>                              all USDT probes
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
> ---
>  libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  libdtrace/dtrace.h         |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> index 883a3e9d..454c53dc 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>   */
>  #include <sys/types.h>
>  #include <assert.h>
> +#include <ctype.h>
>  #include <errno.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  
> @@ -232,6 +233,10 @@ grow_strtab(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +#define USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED	0
> +#define USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE	1
> +#define USDT_FLAG_IGNORE	2
> +
>  /*
>   * Judge whether clause "n" could ever be called as a USDT probe
>   * for this underlying probe.
> @@ -239,7 +244,53 @@ grow_strtab(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
>  static int
>  ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
>  {
> -	/* To be safe, ignore nothing. */
> +	dtrace_probedesc_t	*pdp = &dtp->dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe;
> +	int			*usdt_stat = &dtp->dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_usdt;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Some clauses could never be called for a USDT probe,
> +	 * regardless of the underlying probe uprp.  Cache this
> +	 * status in dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_usdt (pointed to by usdt_stat).
> +	 */
> +	if (*usdt_stat == USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED) {
> +		char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the last char in the provider description is
> +		 * neither '*' nor a digit, it cannot be a USDT probe.
> +		 */
> +		if (lastchar != '*' && !isdigit(lastchar)) {
> +			*usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_IGNORE;
> +			return 1;
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the provider description is "pid[0-9]*", it
> +		 * is a pid probe, not USDT.
> +		 */
> +		if (strncmp(pdp->prv, "pid", 3) == 0) {
> +			int i, l = strlen(pdp->prv);
> +
> +			for (i = 3; i < l; i++)
> +				if (!isdigit((pdp->prv[i])))
> +					break;
> +
> +			if (i == l) {
> +				*usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_IGNORE;
> +				return 1;
> +			}
> +		}
> +
> +		/* Otherwise, it is possibly a USDT probe. */
> +		*usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE;
> +	}
> +	if (*usdt_stat == USDT_FLAG_IGNORE)
> +		return 1;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE, try to use uprp.
> +	 */
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -267,7 +318,8 @@ static void update_uprobe(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, void *datap)
>  	 */
>  	memset(&pcb, 0, sizeof(dt_pcb_t));
>  	for (i = 0; i < dtp->dt_clause_nextid; i++)
> -		dt_pid_create_probes(&dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb, 1);
> +		if (dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_usdt != USDT_FLAG_IGNORE)
> +			dt_pid_create_probes(&dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb, 1);
>  
>  	while (prid < dtp->dt_probe_id) {
>  		dt_bpf_probe_t pinfo;
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dtrace.h b/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> index a23052e4..2de7067f 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> +++ b/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ typedef struct dtrace_stmtdesc {
>  	dtrace_attribute_t dtsd_stmtattr;	/* statement attributes */
>  	int dtsd_clauseflags;			/* clause flags */
>  	int dtsd_index;				/* index in dtp->dt_stmts */
> +	int dtsd_usdt;				/* flags describing USDT use, see dt_prov_uprobe.c */
>  } dtrace_stmtdesc_t;
>  
>  /* dtsd clause flags */

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-29 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-29  5:25 [PATCH 01/19] Change probes from having lists of clauses to lists of stmts eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 02/19] Add a hook for a provider-specific "update" function eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 03/19] Widen the EPID to include the PRID eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:28   ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-08-29 20:38     ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 04/19] Eliminate dt_pdesc eugene.loh
2024-09-03 17:47   ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 05/19] Add flag to dt_pid_create_probes() eugene.loh
2024-09-18 20:33   ` Kris Van Hees
2024-09-24 20:24     ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 06/19] Allow for USDT wildcards eugene.loh
2024-09-17 17:34   ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 07/19] Create the BPF usdt_prids map eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 08/19] Support multiple overlying probes in the uprobe trampoline eugene.loh
2024-10-24  2:42   ` Kris Van Hees
2024-10-24 13:52     ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-10-24 23:30       ` Eugene Loh
2024-10-25  0:14         ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 09/19] Use usdt_prids map to call clauses conditionally for USDT probes eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 10/19] Remove the is-enabled provider eugene.loh
2024-10-24 15:18   ` Kris Van Hees
2024-10-26  1:13     ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 11/19] Support USDT wildcard provider descriptions eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 12/19] Increase size of BPF probes map eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:30   ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-10-08 22:15   ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 13/19] Get rid of relocatable EPID, dt_nextepid, and dt_ddesc[] eugene.loh
2024-09-03 17:49   ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 14/19] Ignore clauses in USDT trampoline if we know they are impossible eugene.loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 15/19] Ignore clauses: some clauses are impossible regardless of uprp eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:31   ` Sam James [this message]
2024-09-03 19:54     ` [DTrace-devel] " Eugene Loh
2024-09-03 20:10       ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 16/19] Ignore clauses: use underlying probe's function information eugene.loh
2024-10-24 16:52   ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 17/19] test: Add a pid-USDT test eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:32   ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-10-04  4:49     ` Eugene Loh
2024-10-04  5:51       ` Sam James
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 18/19] test: Add a lazy USDT test eugene.loh
2024-09-28  2:11   ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29  5:25 ` [PATCH 19/19] test: Add another USDT open/close test eugene.loh
2024-10-24 17:01   ` Kris Van Hees
2024-09-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 01/19] Change probes from having lists of clauses to lists of stmts Kris Van Hees

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ikvjf4ua.fsf@gentoo.org \
    --to=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    --cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox