From: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>
To: "eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com>
Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, eugene.loh@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH 15/19] Ignore clauses: some clauses are impossible regardless of uprp
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2024 21:31:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ikvjf4ua.fsf@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240829052558.3525-15-eugene.loh@oracle.com> (eugene loh's message of "Thu, 29 Aug 2024 01:25:54 -0400")
"eugene.loh--- via DTrace-devel" <dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com> writes:
> From: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
>
> In ignore_clauses, for an underlying probe uprp, we try to
> decide if we can safely ignore clause n.
>
> Meanwhile, for some clauses, the probe description tells us the
> clause will not be called for any USDT probe, regardless of the
> underlying probe. For example, "syscall::write:" can safely be
> ignored, for all uprp.
>
> Add a dtsd_usdt variable to each statement to track status:
Not that it really matters here, but I wonder why not an enum?
>
> USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED not yet initialized
>
> USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE clause could possibly be called
> for some USDT probe
>
> USDT_FLAG_IGNORE clause can safely be ignored for
> all USDT probes
>
> Signed-off-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
> ---
> libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> libdtrace/dtrace.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> index 883a3e9d..454c53dc 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_prov_uprobe.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> */
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <assert.h>
> +#include <ctype.h>
> #include <errno.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
> @@ -232,6 +233,10 @@ grow_strtab(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#define USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED 0
> +#define USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE 1
> +#define USDT_FLAG_IGNORE 2
> +
> /*
> * Judge whether clause "n" could ever be called as a USDT probe
> * for this underlying probe.
> @@ -239,7 +244,53 @@ grow_strtab(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
> static int
> ignore_clause(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, int n, const dt_probe_t *uprp)
> {
> - /* To be safe, ignore nothing. */
> + dtrace_probedesc_t *pdp = &dtp->dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe;
> + int *usdt_stat = &dtp->dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_usdt;
> +
> + /*
> + * Some clauses could never be called for a USDT probe,
> + * regardless of the underlying probe uprp. Cache this
> + * status in dt_stmts[n]->dtsd_usdt (pointed to by usdt_stat).
> + */
> + if (*usdt_stat == USDT_FLAG_UNINITIALIZED) {
> + char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
> +
> + /*
> + * If the last char in the provider description is
> + * neither '*' nor a digit, it cannot be a USDT probe.
> + */
> + if (lastchar != '*' && !isdigit(lastchar)) {
> + *usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_IGNORE;
> + return 1;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If the provider description is "pid[0-9]*", it
> + * is a pid probe, not USDT.
> + */
> + if (strncmp(pdp->prv, "pid", 3) == 0) {
> + int i, l = strlen(pdp->prv);
> +
> + for (i = 3; i < l; i++)
> + if (!isdigit((pdp->prv[i])))
> + break;
> +
> + if (i == l) {
> + *usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_IGNORE;
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Otherwise, it is possibly a USDT probe. */
> + *usdt_stat = USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE;
> + }
> + if (*usdt_stat == USDT_FLAG_IGNORE)
> + return 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * If USDT_FLAG_POSSIBLE, try to use uprp.
> + */
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -267,7 +318,8 @@ static void update_uprobe(dtrace_hdl_t *dtp, void *datap)
> */
> memset(&pcb, 0, sizeof(dt_pcb_t));
> for (i = 0; i < dtp->dt_clause_nextid; i++)
> - dt_pid_create_probes(&dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb, 1);
> + if (dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_usdt != USDT_FLAG_IGNORE)
> + dt_pid_create_probes(&dtp->dt_stmts[i]->dtsd_ecbdesc->dted_probe, dtp, &pcb, 1);
>
> while (prid < dtp->dt_probe_id) {
> dt_bpf_probe_t pinfo;
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dtrace.h b/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> index a23052e4..2de7067f 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> +++ b/libdtrace/dtrace.h
> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ typedef struct dtrace_stmtdesc {
> dtrace_attribute_t dtsd_stmtattr; /* statement attributes */
> int dtsd_clauseflags; /* clause flags */
> int dtsd_index; /* index in dtp->dt_stmts */
> + int dtsd_usdt; /* flags describing USDT use, see dt_prov_uprobe.c */
> } dtrace_stmtdesc_t;
>
> /* dtsd clause flags */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-29 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-29 5:25 [PATCH 01/19] Change probes from having lists of clauses to lists of stmts eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 02/19] Add a hook for a provider-specific "update" function eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 03/19] Widen the EPID to include the PRID eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:28 ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-08-29 20:38 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 04/19] Eliminate dt_pdesc eugene.loh
2024-09-03 17:47 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 05/19] Add flag to dt_pid_create_probes() eugene.loh
2024-09-18 20:33 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-09-24 20:24 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 06/19] Allow for USDT wildcards eugene.loh
2024-09-17 17:34 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 07/19] Create the BPF usdt_prids map eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 08/19] Support multiple overlying probes in the uprobe trampoline eugene.loh
2024-10-24 2:42 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-10-24 13:52 ` [DTrace-devel] " Kris Van Hees
2024-10-24 23:30 ` Eugene Loh
2024-10-25 0:14 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 09/19] Use usdt_prids map to call clauses conditionally for USDT probes eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 10/19] Remove the is-enabled provider eugene.loh
2024-10-24 15:18 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-10-26 1:13 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 11/19] Support USDT wildcard provider descriptions eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 12/19] Increase size of BPF probes map eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:30 ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-10-08 22:15 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 13/19] Get rid of relocatable EPID, dt_nextepid, and dt_ddesc[] eugene.loh
2024-09-03 17:49 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 14/19] Ignore clauses in USDT trampoline if we know they are impossible eugene.loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 15/19] Ignore clauses: some clauses are impossible regardless of uprp eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:31 ` Sam James [this message]
2024-09-03 19:54 ` [DTrace-devel] " Eugene Loh
2024-09-03 20:10 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 16/19] Ignore clauses: use underlying probe's function information eugene.loh
2024-10-24 16:52 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 17/19] test: Add a pid-USDT test eugene.loh
2024-08-29 20:32 ` [DTrace-devel] " Sam James
2024-10-04 4:49 ` Eugene Loh
2024-10-04 5:51 ` Sam James
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 18/19] test: Add a lazy USDT test eugene.loh
2024-09-28 2:11 ` Eugene Loh
2024-08-29 5:25 ` [PATCH 19/19] test: Add another USDT open/close test eugene.loh
2024-10-24 17:01 ` Kris Van Hees
2024-09-18 14:18 ` [PATCH 01/19] Change probes from having lists of clauses to lists of stmts Kris Van Hees
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ikvjf4ua.fsf@gentoo.org \
--to=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com \
--cc=dtrace@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=eugene.loh@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox