From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=81.187.191.129 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1793972535; b=CGTiLiXR8Jx4M3quRSfDgknomEP0KCrJDzXnpcEBNhMIJYG8koPMDNmY7FP9vvZWNldJ wfht5iFgPQ3LUg5EFqCYBxHkOCE94sSNxA9leeLCe3Qi4Yf6P1hm1Z5lkgp6C9nDPYcIh NOS/UZo1rTnMZTHR+VF1fnnjxuVpexkO7t8XK2PxRQPbS/2W5ekwPYj10vnZmsdiYSSFf HHCoThXp8wUk5D5noa7NGjAax+qwgPhxMmLabY3HvRda6xGMEFHLlgg2nigpDnxgJuTTs S2g0uXhvW8AJVsgXbHb5A+qGI7Q4ZpygjfFpuRLnaYu3EGKSX/DtAiiqQmOc5ibR5qA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1793972535; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Emacs:Date:Message-ID:User-Agent:MIME-Version:Content-Type: X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics; bh=04FcpDayLw9yUhGDlt9CqjnCpl8CnQ3OPLUNzxoGV0o=; b=JTCsyw+KAJo+vHqy254XZnqeQ8l012WJwnrLL2xDZoLQ7WDo7HY8jOS9y24Rbvd99OF/ Na0ppOzkIClbzhGaLnqN10sQlwxc/9ehwsozzyrwlVI7TiMR+kMQTxvSmEmq4fW+tuI9b yQjU+7OK33H/RJGueWChm4GWVTJBcRB0vaMvLI0FdOeRsdc6eu799drUklA8Btdgb04J9 AIsERL9MgnwprqM/1KMAJDC49acoz7Wq4pSa1F/qDkBVEuALRVql1Q4Xs1FQyPESinMvH VRZiWeXx++Hi4J0t4bilaF/qhS549nO2LtQ94EXL9HLBXKt2J/Xb6v6WX4klD8UlRPA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=esperi.org.uk; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=esperi.org.uk; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=81.187.191.129 Received: from mail.esperi.org.uk (icebox.esperi.org.uk [81.187.191.129]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03D06606A329 for ; Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:42:14 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 03D06606A329 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=esperi.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=esperi.org.uk Received: from loom (nix@sidle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.8]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.17.2/8.17.2) with ESMTPS id 6A6DgBDs015903 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Nov 2026 13:42:11 GMT From: Nick Alcock To: Kris Van Hees Cc: dtrace@lists.linux.dev, dtrace-devel@oss.oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/20] test: ensure expected output works for older and newer kernels In-Reply-To: <463fcd5adbd3fd710d2579b5873bb6b5@oracle.com> References: <463fcd5adbd3fd710d2579b5873bb6b5@oracle.com> Emacs: resistance is futile; you will be assimilated and byte-compiled. Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2026 13:42:11 +0000 Message-ID: <87ld76qdos.fsf@esperi.org.uk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) X-Mailing-List: dtrace@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: loom 1290; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 On 30 Oct 2026, Kris Van Hees told this: > Older kernel BPF verifiers report -EFAULT whereras newer ones report > -E2BIG. Support both, and also make the tests more robust if code > generation might result in a less predictable jump count. > > Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees Hm, this only seems to be loking for *some* error now, without concern for what it was. In particulary it's not looking for -E2BIG at all, But I suppose as long as we're looking for the bpflogsize error message it's OK. Reviewed-by: Nick Alcock -- NULL && (void)