* [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name
@ 2026-02-09 18:35 Kris Van Hees
2026-02-09 19:22 ` [DTrace-devel] " Eugene Loh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kris Van Hees @ 2026-02-09 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dtrace, dtrace-devel
Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
---
libdtrace/dt_pid.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
index 517b9265..ef97c8d9 100644
--- a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
+++ b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
@@ -1568,6 +1568,10 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_probedesc_t *pdp, dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
char *globpat = NULL;
int err = 0, i, nmatches = 0;
+ /* If the function name is "-", we're done. */
+ if (pdp->fun[0] == '-' && pdp->fun[1] == '\0')
+ return 0;
+
/* If it cannot end with a pid, we're done. */
if (pdp->prv[0] != '\0') {
char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
--
2.51.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name
2026-02-09 18:35 [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name Kris Van Hees
@ 2026-02-09 19:22 ` Eugene Loh
2026-02-09 19:37 ` Kris Van Hees
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Loh @ 2026-02-09 19:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kris Van Hees, dtrace, dtrace-devel
Could we have a little more explanation here? Like, what is wrong with
the current behavior (which is... to complain that the probe is not
found?)? And should any test check the behavior?
On 2/9/26 13:35, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
> ---
> libdtrace/dt_pid.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> index 517b9265..ef97c8d9 100644
> --- a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> @@ -1568,6 +1568,10 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_probedesc_t *pdp, dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
> char *globpat = NULL;
> int err = 0, i, nmatches = 0;
>
> + /* If the function name is "-", we're done. */
> + if (pdp->fun[0] == '-' && pdp->fun[1] == '\0')
> + return 0;
> +
> /* If it cannot end with a pid, we're done. */
> if (pdp->prv[0] != '\0') {
> char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name
2026-02-09 19:22 ` [DTrace-devel] " Eugene Loh
@ 2026-02-09 19:37 ` Kris Van Hees
2026-02-09 19:38 ` Eugene Loh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kris Van Hees @ 2026-02-09 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eugene Loh; +Cc: Kris Van Hees, dtrace, dtrace-devel
On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:22:11PM -0500, Eugene Loh wrote:
> Could we have a little more explanation here? Like, what is wrong with the
> current behavior (which is... to complain that the probe is not found?)?
> And should any test check the behavior?
It is an optimization. That is why I added it right above the test to see
if there is a pid in the provider name. That was also an optimization. In
both cases we bail if we can determine immediately that the presented probedesc
cannot be a USDT probe.
> On 2/9/26 13:35, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
> > ---
> > libdtrace/dt_pid.c | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> > index 517b9265..ef97c8d9 100644
> > --- a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> > +++ b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
> > @@ -1568,6 +1568,10 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_probedesc_t *pdp, dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
> > char *globpat = NULL;
> > int err = 0, i, nmatches = 0;
> > + /* If the function name is "-", we're done. */
> > + if (pdp->fun[0] == '-' && pdp->fun[1] == '\0')
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > /* If it cannot end with a pid, we're done. */
> > if (pdp->prv[0] != '\0') {
> > char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [DTrace-devel] [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name
2026-02-09 19:37 ` Kris Van Hees
@ 2026-02-09 19:38 ` Eugene Loh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eugene Loh @ 2026-02-09 19:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kris Van Hees; +Cc: dtrace, dtrace-devel
Okay, but I like having some explanation like that in the commit
message. Anyhow,
Reviewed-by: Eugene Loh <eugene.loh@oracle.com>
On 2/9/26 14:37, Kris Van Hees wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2026 at 02:22:11PM -0500, Eugene Loh wrote:
>> Could we have a little more explanation here? Like, what is wrong with the
>> current behavior (which is... to complain that the probe is not found?)?
>> And should any test check the behavior?
> It is an optimization. That is why I added it right above the test to see
> if there is a pid in the provider name. That was also an optimization. In
> both cases we bail if we can determine immediately that the presented probedesc
> cannot be a USDT probe.
>
>> On 2/9/26 13:35, Kris Van Hees via DTrace-devel wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <kris.van.hees@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> libdtrace/dt_pid.c | 4 ++++
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
>>> index 517b9265..ef97c8d9 100644
>>> --- a/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
>>> +++ b/libdtrace/dt_pid.c
>>> @@ -1568,6 +1568,10 @@ dt_pid_create_usdt_probes(dtrace_probedesc_t *pdp, dtrace_hdl_t *dtp)
>>> char *globpat = NULL;
>>> int err = 0, i, nmatches = 0;
>>> + /* If the function name is "-", we're done. */
>>> + if (pdp->fun[0] == '-' && pdp->fun[1] == '\0')
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> /* If it cannot end with a pid, we're done. */
>>> if (pdp->prv[0] != '\0') {
>>> char lastchar = pdp->prv[strlen(pdp->prv) - 1];
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-02-09 19:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-02-09 18:35 [PATCH] pid: USDT probes cannot have "-" as function name Kris Van Hees
2026-02-09 19:22 ` [DTrace-devel] " Eugene Loh
2026-02-09 19:37 ` Kris Van Hees
2026-02-09 19:38 ` Eugene Loh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox