public inbox for dwarves@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: dwarves@vger.kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
	acme@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] bpf: implement bpf_wq_set_callback kfunc with implicit prog_aux
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:17:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250924211716.1287715-5-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924211716.1287715-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

Add bpf_wq_set_callback BPF kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG,
corresponding to bpf_wq_set_callback_impl kfunc. Teach the verifier
about it.

To be handled correctly, BTF for this kfunc must be generated with
pahole version that supports KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG.

Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
 kernel/bpf/helpers.c                           | 18 +++++++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c                          | 15 +++++++++------
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c  |  4 ++--
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index c9fab9a356df..6b46acfec790 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -3065,12 +3065,11 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_start(struct bpf_wq *wq, unsigned int flags)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-__bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq,
-					 int (callback_fn)(void *map, int *key, void *value),
-					 unsigned int flags,
-					 void *aux__prog)
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_set_callback(struct bpf_wq *wq,
+				    int (callback_fn)(void *map, int *key, void *value),
+				    unsigned int flags,
+				    struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
 {
-	struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = (struct bpf_prog_aux *)aux__prog;
 	struct bpf_async_kern *async = (struct bpf_async_kern *)wq;
 
 	if (flags)
@@ -3079,6 +3078,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq,
 	return __bpf_async_set_callback(async, callback_fn, aux, flags, BPF_ASYNC_TYPE_WQ);
 }
 
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_wq_set_callback_impl(struct bpf_wq *wq,
+					 int (callback_fn)(void *map, int *key, void *value),
+					 unsigned int flags,
+					 void *aux__prog)
+{
+	return bpf_wq_set_callback(wq, callback_fn, flags, aux__prog);
+}
+
 __bpf_kfunc void bpf_preempt_disable(void)
 {
 	preempt_disable();
@@ -4374,6 +4381,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cgroup_read_xattr, KF_RCU)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_stream_vprintk, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_wq_set_callback, KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG)
 BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
 
 static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set common_kfunc_set = {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f1f9ea21f99b..a29d3b85aed2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn);
 
-static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
+static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(u32 btf_id);
 
 static bool is_sync_callback_calling_function(enum bpf_func_id func_id)
 {
@@ -10586,7 +10586,7 @@ static int push_callback_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *ins
 		env->subprog_info[subprog].is_async_cb = true;
 		async_cb = push_async_cb(env, env->subprog_info[subprog].start,
 					 insn_idx, subprog,
-					 is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(insn->imm) ||
+					 is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(insn->imm) ||
 					 is_task_work_add_kfunc(insn->imm));
 		if (!async_cb)
 			return -EFAULT;
@@ -12278,6 +12278,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
 	KF___bpf_trap,
 	KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_signal,
 	KF_bpf_task_work_schedule_resume,
+	KF_bpf_wq_set_callback,
 };
 
 BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
@@ -12350,6 +12351,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_res_spin_unlock_irqrestore)
 BTF_ID(func, __bpf_trap)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal)
 BTF_ID(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_wq_set_callback)
 
 static bool is_task_work_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
 {
@@ -12797,7 +12799,7 @@ static bool is_sync_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 
 static bool is_async_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 {
-	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl] ||
+	return is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(btf_id) ||
 	       is_task_work_add_kfunc(btf_id);
 }
 
@@ -12807,9 +12809,10 @@ static bool is_bpf_throw_kfunc(struct bpf_insn *insn)
 	       insn->imm == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_throw];
 }
 
-static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
+static bool is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
 {
-	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl];
+	return btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl] ||
+	       btf_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_wq_set_callback];
 }
 
 static bool is_callback_calling_kfunc(u32 btf_id)
@@ -13910,7 +13913,7 @@ static int check_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 		meta.r0_rdonly = false;
 	}
 
-	if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_impl_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
+	if (is_bpf_wq_set_callback_kfunc(meta.func_id)) {
 		err = push_callback_call(env, insn, insn_idx, meta.subprogno,
 					 set_timer_callback_state);
 		if (err) {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c
index 4240211a1900..9295b45ef27c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/wq_failures.c
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ __failure
 /* check that the first argument of bpf_wq_set_callback()
  * is a correct bpf_wq pointer.
  */
-__msg(": (85) call bpf_wq_set_callback_impl#") /* anchor message */
+__msg(": (85) call bpf_wq_set_callback#") /* anchor message */
 __msg("arg#0 doesn't point to a map value")
 long test_wrong_wq_pointer(void *ctx)
 {
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ __failure
 /* check that the first argument of bpf_wq_set_callback()
  * is a correct bpf_wq pointer.
  */
-__msg(": (85) call bpf_wq_set_callback_impl#") /* anchor message */
+__msg(": (85) call bpf_wq_set_callback#") /* anchor message */
 __msg("off 1 doesn't point to 'struct bpf_wq' that is at 0")
 long test_wrong_wq_pointer_offset(void *ctx)
 {
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 21:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 21:17 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] bpf: implicit bpf_prog_aux argument for kfuncs Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: implement KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG flag Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25  9:49   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:13     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:23       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-25 19:34         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 22:54           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-25 22:57             ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-09-25 23:07               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-26 12:10                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-26 15:11                   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] bpf,docs: Add documentation for KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] selftests/bpf: update bpf_wq_set_callback macro Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25  9:53   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:19     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:24   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] bpf: mark bpf_stream_vprink kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 10:01   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:32     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:28     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] bpf: mark bpf_task_work_* kfuncs " Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 14:05   ` Mykyta Yatsenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250924211716.1287715-5-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox