From: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: dwarves@vger.kernel.org, alan.maguire@oracle.com,
acme@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] bpf: mark bpf_task_work_* kfuncs with KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:17:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250924211716.1287715-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250924211716.1287715-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Two kfuncs that use aux__prog argument were recently added [1]:
* bpf_task_work_schedule_resume
* bpf_task_work_schedule_signal
Update them to use the new kfunc flag and fix usages in the selftests.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250923112404.668720-1-mykyta.yatsenko5@gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 16 ++++++++--------
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work.c | 6 +++---
.../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_fail.c | 8 ++++----
.../selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_stress.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 875195a0ea72..ccdc204a66cf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -4178,15 +4178,15 @@ static int bpf_task_work_schedule(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work
* @tw: Pointer to struct bpf_task_work in BPF map value for internal bookkeeping
* @map__map: bpf_map that embeds struct bpf_task_work in the values
* @callback: pointer to BPF subprogram to call
- * @aux__prog: user should pass NULL
+ * @aux: pointer to bpf_prog_aux of the caller BPF program, implicitly set by the verifier
*
* Return: 0 if task work has been scheduled successfully, negative error code otherwise
*/
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work *tw,
void *map__map, bpf_task_work_callback_t callback,
- void *aux__prog)
+ struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
{
- return bpf_task_work_schedule(task, tw, map__map, callback, aux__prog, TWA_SIGNAL);
+ return bpf_task_work_schedule(task, tw, map__map, callback, aux, TWA_SIGNAL);
}
/**
@@ -4195,15 +4195,15 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(struct task_struct *task, struct b
* @tw: Pointer to struct bpf_task_work in BPF map value for internal bookkeeping
* @map__map: bpf_map that embeds struct bpf_task_work in the values
* @callback: pointer to BPF subprogram to call
- * @aux__prog: user should pass NULL
+ * @aux: pointer to bpf_prog_aux of the caller BPF program, implicitly set by the verifier
*
* Return: 0 if task work has been scheduled successfully, negative error code otherwise
*/
__bpf_kfunc int bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(struct task_struct *task, struct bpf_task_work *tw,
void *map__map, bpf_task_work_callback_t callback,
- void *aux__prog)
+ struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
{
- return bpf_task_work_schedule(task, tw, map__map, callback, aux__prog, TWA_RESUME);
+ return bpf_task_work_schedule(task, tw, map__map, callback, aux, TWA_RESUME);
}
__bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
@@ -4379,8 +4379,8 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_strnstr);
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_cgroup_read_xattr, KF_RCU)
#endif
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_stream_vprintk, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
-BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_signal, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_task_work_schedule_resume, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS | KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_wq_set_callback, KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG)
BTF_KFUNCS_END(common_btf_ids)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work.c
index 23217f06a3ec..eedd5c3dabb4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ int oncpu_hash_map(struct pt_regs *args)
if (!work)
return 0;
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &hmap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &hmap, process_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int oncpu_array_map(struct pt_regs *args)
work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &key);
if (!work)
return 0;
- bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(task, &work->tw, &arrmap, process_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -102,6 +102,6 @@ int oncpu_lru_map(struct pt_regs *args)
work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&lrumap, &key);
if (!work || work->data[0])
return 0;
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &lrumap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &lrumap, process_work);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_fail.c
index 77fe8f28facd..82e4b8913333 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_fail.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ int mismatch_map(struct pt_regs *args)
work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &key);
if (!work)
return 0;
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &hmap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, &hmap, process_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ int no_map_task_work(struct pt_regs *args)
struct bpf_task_work tw;
task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &tw, &hmap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &tw, &hmap, process_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ int task_work_null(struct pt_regs *args)
struct task_struct *task;
task = bpf_get_current_task_btf();
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, NULL, &hmap, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, NULL, &hmap, process_work);
return 0;
}
@@ -91,6 +91,6 @@ int map_null(struct pt_regs *args)
work = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&arrmap, &key);
if (!work)
return 0;
- bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, NULL, process_work, NULL);
+ bpf_task_work_schedule_resume(task, &work->tw, NULL, process_work);
return 0;
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_stress.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_stress.c
index 90fca06fff56..1d4378f351ef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_stress.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_work_stress.c
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ int schedule_task_work(void *ctx)
return 0;
}
err = bpf_task_work_schedule_signal(bpf_get_current_task_btf(), &work->tw, &hmap,
- process_work, NULL);
+ process_work);
if (err)
__sync_fetch_and_add(&schedule_error, 1);
else
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-24 21:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-24 21:17 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/6] bpf: implicit bpf_prog_aux argument for kfuncs Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/6] bpf: implement KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG flag Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 9:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:13 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-25 19:34 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 22:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-25 22:57 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-09-25 23:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-26 12:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-26 15:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/6] bpf,docs: Add documentation for KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/6] selftests/bpf: update bpf_wq_set_callback macro Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 9:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:19 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:24 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/6] bpf: implement bpf_wq_set_callback kfunc with implicit prog_aux Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-24 21:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/6] bpf: mark bpf_stream_vprink kfunc with KF_IMPLICIT_PROG_AUX_ARG Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 10:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-09-25 16:32 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-09-25 17:28 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-24 21:17 ` Ihor Solodrai [this message]
2025-09-25 14:05 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/6] bpf: mark bpf_task_work_* kfuncs " Mykyta Yatsenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250924211716.1287715-7-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--to=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox