From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, dwarves@vger.kernel.org,
alan.maguire@oracle.com, acme@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
tj@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:24:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029190113.3323406-4-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Hi Ihor,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ihor-Solodrai/bpf-Add-BTF_ID_LIST_END-and-BTF_ID_LIST_SIZE-macros/20251030-030608
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251029190113.3323406-4-ihor.solodrai%40linux.dev
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20251030 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251030/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Debian 13.3.0-16) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251030/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:166:29: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
166 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:84:22: note: in expansion of macro '___PASTE'
84 | #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
| ^~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:166:37: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
166 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:9: note: in expansion of macro '__UNIQUE_ID'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:289:9: note: in expansion of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
289 | ___ADDRESSABLE(sym, __section(".discard.addressable"))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/uapi/linux/filter.h:9,
from include/linux/bpf.h:8:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:15: error: 'unbound_reg_init' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'unbound_reg'?
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:72: note: in definition of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:72: note: in definition of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:6,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:108,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:8,
from include/linux/workqueue.h:9,
from include/linux/bpf.h:11:
>> include/linux/init.h:256:9: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'asm'
256 | asm(".section \"" __sec "\", \"a\" \n" \
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:
include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: expected declaration specifiers before '_Static_assert'
78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert'
77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:260:9: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert'
260 | static_assert(__same_type(initcall_t, &fn));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:32: error: expected declaration specifiers before ';' token
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18987:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
18987 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19002:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19002 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19015:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19015 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19139:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19139 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19212:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19212 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19232:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19232 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19241:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19241 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19282:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19282 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19343:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19343 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19373:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19373 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19390:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19390 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19453:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19453 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19477:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19477 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19833:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19833 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19861:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19861 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19867:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19867 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19878:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19878 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19884:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19884 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19930:1: warning: empty declaration
vim +/asm +256 include/linux/init.h
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 252
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 253 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 254 #define ____define_initcall(fn, __stub, __name, __sec) \
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 255 __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 @256 asm(".section \"" __sec "\", \"a\" \n" \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 257 __stringify(__name) ": \n" \
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 258 ".long " __stringify(__stub) " - . \n" \
1cb61759d407166 Marco Elver 2021-05-21 259 ".previous \n"); \
1cb61759d407166 Marco Elver 2021-05-21 260 static_assert(__same_type(initcall_t, &fn));
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 261 #else
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 262 #define ____define_initcall(fn, __unused, __name, __sec) \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 263 static initcall_t __name __used \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 264 __attribute__((__section__(__sec))) = fn;
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 265 #endif
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 266
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 19:01 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Add BTF_ID_LIST_END and BTF_ID_LIST_SIZE macros Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:44 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: Refactor btf_kfunc_id_set_contains Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:59 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 0:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-30 16:31 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 17:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 10:24 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-30 11:58 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-30 13:54 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf: Support __magic prog_aux arguments for kfuncs Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_wq_set_callback as magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:16 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf,docs: Document KF_MAGIC_ARGS flag and __magic annotation Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_task_work_schedule_* kfuncs as magic Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_stream_vprintk as a magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 6:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:24 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 18:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:26 ` Alan Maguire
2025-10-30 18:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:46 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 19:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-30 20:02 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 20:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox