From: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
dwarves@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: [PATCH dwarves v4 05/11] dwarf_laoder: Handle locations with DW_OP_fbreg
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 18:32:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260326013210.2905836-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260326013144.2901265-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev>
DW_OP_fbreg means the parameter value will be stored on the
stack. So the corresponding parameter register is not used.
For example:
0x071f7717: DW_TAG_subprogram
DW_AT_name ("jent_health_failure")
DW_AT_calling_convention (DW_CC_nocall)
DW_AT_type (0x071f7626 "unsigned int")
...
0x071f7728: DW_TAG_formal_parameter
DW_AT_location (DW_OP_fbreg -8)
DW_AT_name ("ec")
DW_AT_type (0x071f7ab6 "rand_data *")
...
0x071f7734: NULL
In the above, the parameter 'ec' type is a pointer so it perfectly fits
into a register. But the location uses 'DW_OP_fbreg -8' which prevents
from generating a function with true signatures. I didn't find an example
in vmlinux. The above example is from a crypto module.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
---
dwarf_loader.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dwarf_loader.c b/dwarf_loader.c
index c8aeca2..9e103ac 100644
--- a/dwarf_loader.c
+++ b/dwarf_loader.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static ptrdiff_t __dwarf_getlocations(Dwarf_Attribute *attr,
}
#define PARM_DEFAULT_FAIL -1
+#define PARM_UNEXPECTED -2
/* Max 20 register parameters, considering some parameters may be optimized out. */
#define MAX_PRESCAN_PARAMS 20
@@ -1285,7 +1286,8 @@ static int parameter__peek_first_reg(Dwarf_Die *die)
* list, return the register; otherwise save register for later return
* - otherwise if no register was found for locations, return PARM_DEFAULT_FAIL.
*/
-static int parameter__reg(Dwarf_Attribute *attr, int expected_reg)
+static int parameter__reg(Dwarf_Attribute *attr, int expected_reg, struct conf_load *conf,
+ struct func_info *info)
{
Dwarf_Addr base, start, end;
Dwarf_Op *expr, *entry_ops;
@@ -1321,6 +1323,16 @@ static int parameter__reg(Dwarf_Attribute *attr, int expected_reg)
if (ret == expected_reg)
goto out;
break;
+ case DW_OP_fbreg:
+ /* The location like
+ * DW_AT_location (DW_OP_fbreg +<num>)
+ * indicates that the parameter is on the stack. But it is possible
+ * that the parameter can fit in register(s). So conservatively
+ * mark this parameter not suitable for true signatures.
+ */
+ if (info->signature_changed && conf->true_signature)
+ ret = PARM_UNEXPECTED;
+ break;
/* match DW_OP_entry_value(DW_OP_regXX) at any location */
case DW_OP_entry_value:
case DW_OP_GNU_entry_value:
@@ -1403,11 +1415,11 @@ static struct parameter *parameter__new(Dwarf_Die *die, struct cu *cu,
if (parm->has_loc) {
int expected_reg = cu->register_params[reg_idx];
- int actual_reg = parameter__reg(&attr, expected_reg);
+ int actual_reg = parameter__reg(&attr, expected_reg, conf, info);
if (actual_reg == PARM_DEFAULT_FAIL)
parm->optimized = 1;
- else if (expected_reg >= 0 && expected_reg != actual_reg)
+ else if (actual_reg == PARM_UNEXPECTED || (expected_reg >= 0 && expected_reg != actual_reg))
/* mark parameters that use an unexpected
* register to hold a parameter; these will
* be problematic for users of BTF as they
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-26 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-26 1:31 [PATCH dwarves v4 00/11] pahole: Encode true signatures in kernel BTF Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:31 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 01/11] dwarf_loader: Reduce parameter checking with clang DW_AT_calling_convention attr Yonghong Song
2026-03-30 8:31 ` Alan Maguire
2026-03-26 1:31 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 02/11] dwarf_loader: Prescan all parameters with expected registers Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:31 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 03/11] dwarf_loader: Handle signatures with dead arguments Yonghong Song
2026-03-30 10:13 ` Alan Maguire
2026-03-26 1:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 04/11] dwarf_loader: Refactor initial ret -1 to be macro PARM_DEFAULT_FAIL Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:32 ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2026-03-26 1:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 06/11] dwarf_loader: Change exprlen checking condition in parameter__reg() Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 07/11] dwarf_loader: Detect optimized parameters with locations having constant values Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 08/11] dwarf_loader: Check whether two-reg parameter actually use two regs or not Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:32 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 09/11] dwarf_loader: Handle expression lists Yonghong Song
2026-03-31 8:04 ` Alan Maguire
2026-03-26 1:33 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 10/11] btf_encoder: Handle optimized parameter properly Yonghong Song
2026-03-26 1:33 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 11/11] tests: Add a few clang true signature tests Yonghong Song
2026-03-27 16:02 ` [PATCH dwarves v4 00/11] pahole: Encode true signatures in kernel BTF Alan Maguire
2026-03-27 19:38 ` Yonghong Song
2026-03-30 9:56 ` Alan Maguire
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260326013210.2905836-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--to=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox