Is 1.30 released?

Is 1.30 released?

[Domenico Andreoli]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 491 bytes --]

Hello,

I see from [0] that v1.30 has been tagged but I missed the announcement.
Additionally [1] does not show an updated (& signed) tarball.

Is everything in order here?

Regards,
Domenico


[0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/devel/pahole/pahole.git/commit/?id=b45268b74da1861577498cd5dd77103d55edc3e8
[1] https://fedorapeople.org/~acme/dwarves/

-- 
rsa4096: 3B10 0CA1 8674 ACBA B4FE  FCD2 CE5B CF17 9960 DE13
ed25519: FFB4 0CC3 7F2E 091D F7DA  356E CC79 2832 ED38 CB05

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: Is 1.30 released?

[Alan Maguire]

On 15/04/2025 10:26, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I see from [0] that v1.30 has been tagged but I missed the announcement.
> Additionally [1] does not show an updated (& signed) tarball.
> 
> Is everything in order here?
>

Arnaldo got some late reports of build failures when we were finalizing
the release; we're awaiting more data to determine what's happening.

Alan

Re: Is 1.30 released?

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:51:59AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
> On 15/04/2025 10:26, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I see from [0] that v1.30 has been tagged but I missed the announcement.
> > Additionally [1] does not show an updated (& signed) tarball.
> > 
> > Is everything in order here?
> >
> 
> Arnaldo got some late reports of build failures when we were finalizing
> the release; we're awaiting more data to determine what's happening.

You mean this report:

https://github.com/acmel/dwarves/issues/63

It is not something new, they say they started seeing the problem when
switching from 1.25 to 1.26, so not related to what is in 1.30.

And I _think_ this is just a correlation, the cause seems to be a change
in how they link software, they have LTO enabled, etc.

I did some analysis and updated that github issue.

Or are you talking about some other case?

If this is the case I think we can go ahead with releasing 1.30.

- Arnaldo

Re: Is 1.30 released?

[Alan Maguire]

On 16/04/2025 20:34, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 08:51:59AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
>> On 15/04/2025 10:26, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I see from [0] that v1.30 has been tagged but I missed the announcement.
>>> Additionally [1] does not show an updated (& signed) tarball.
>>>
>>> Is everything in order here?
>>>
>>
>> Arnaldo got some late reports of build failures when we were finalizing
>> the release; we're awaiting more data to determine what's happening.
> 
> You mean this report:
> 
> https://github.com/acmel/dwarves/issues/63
> 
> It is not something new, they say they started seeing the problem when
> switching from 1.25 to 1.26, so not related to what is in 1.30.
> 
> And I _think_ this is just a correlation, the cause seems to be a change
> in how they link software, they have LTO enabled, etc.
> 
> I did some analysis and updated that github issue.
> 
> Or are you talking about some other case?
> 

Nope, that's the one; didn't realize it was an existing issue.

> If this is the case I think we can go ahead with releasing 1.30.
>

Sounds good!

Alan